Scleral Lens Clearance Assessment with Biomicroscopy and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

TitleScleral Lens Clearance Assessment with Biomicroscopy and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsYeung, D., and L. Sorbara
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume95
Pagination13-20
Keywordsadult, anterior eye segment, Anterior segment optical coherence tomographies, biomicroscopy, Computer-Assisted, contact lens, Contact lenses, Cornea, Correlation coefficient, diagnostic imaging, female, health survey, Health Surveys, Highly-correlated, human, Humans, Image processing, Interobserver variability, Intrinsic bias, Lenses, male, observer variation, Optical Coherence, Optical coherence tomography, Optical data processing, Optical tomography, procedures, Prosthesis Fitting, prosthetic fitting, sclera, Silicon compounds, slit lamp, slit lamp microscopy, Surveys, Tomography, Web-based surveys
AbstractSIGNIFICANCE It is important to be able to accurately estimate the central corneal clearance when fitting scleral contact lenses. Tools available have intrinsic biases due to the angle of viewing, and therefore an idea of the amount of error in estimation will benefit the fitter. PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of observers' ability to estimate scleral contact lens central corneal clearance (CCC) with biomicroscopy to measurements using slit-lamp imaging and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). METHODS In a Web-based survey with images of four scleral lens fits obtained with a slit-lamp video imaging system, participants were asked to estimate the CCC. Responses were compared with known values of CCC of these images determined with an image-processing program (digital CCC) and using the AS-OCT (AS-OCT CCC). Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients were used to assess the agreement of CCC measured by the various methods. RESULTS Sixty-six participants were categorized for analysis based on the amount of experience with scleral lens fitting into novice, intermediate, or advanced fitters. Comparing the estimated CCC to the digital CCC, all three groups overestimated by an average of +27.3 ± 67.3 μm. The estimated CCC was highly correlated to the digital CCC (0.79, 0.92, and 0.94 for each group, respectively). Compared with the CCC measurements using AS-OCT, the three groups of participants overestimated by +103.3 μm and had high correlations (0.79, 0.93, and 0.94 for each group). DISCUSSION Results from this study validate the ability of contact lens practitioners to observe and estimate the CCC in scleral lens fittings through the use of biomicroscopic viewing. Increasing experience with scleral lens fitting does not improve the correlation with measured CCC from digital or the AS-OCT. However, the intermediate and advanced groups display significantly less inter-observer variability compared with the novice group. Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Optometry.
DOI10.1097/OPX.0000000000001164