Contact Info
Pure MathematicsUniversity of Waterloo
200 University Avenue West
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
N2L 3G1
Departmental office: MC 5304
Phone: 519 888 4567 x43484
Fax: 519 725 0160
Email: puremath@uwaterloo.ca
We will continue our discussion of $n$-systems, and prove a
general "metatheorem'' with a list of conditions that guarantee the
success of a priority construction.
This talk will be a continuation of the discussion in "part 1". There
are a few facts and definitions left to state before the local
consistency algorithm can be explained. Once this is all done, I will
define what it means for a structure to have bounded width, and prove
We say that $\{x,y,z\}$ forms a three term arithmetic progression
(or 3-AP) if $x+z=2y$. For a finite abelian group $G$ we're interested in
finding the largest cardinality of all subsets $A\subseteq G$ with $A$
containing no 3-APs. We denote this cardinality by $D(G)$. In this talk we
On an affine scheme Spec(R), a coherent sheaf is a sheaf that 'comes from a module' over R. In the case where S is a ($\mathbb{Z}$-)graded ring, we may construct a graded S-module out of S by 'twisting' the grading. This sheaf (over Proj(S)) is called O(1). I will go over some non-examples of coherence, and go over the construction and basic properties of O(1).
Many constructions in computability theory are priority
arguments which build a c.e. set satisfying a list of requirements.
The complexity of such a construction can be measured by the
complexity of seeing how the requirements are satisfied, for example,
finite injury arguments are $\Delta_2$. We will introduce $n$-systems,
a general method of formalizing such constructions which is useful
Consider a complex vector bundle $E$ over a manifold $M$. The
This is a continuation of the previous talk.
I will define what it means for a relational structure
$\mathbb{A}$ to have bounded width, and explain why such structures
are important. To do this, the local consistency algorithm has to be
explained, which requires several definitions about relational
structures. The actual definition of bounded width may spill into part
Abstract: We say that $\{x,y,z\}$ forms a three term arithmetic
progression (or 3-AP) if $x+z=2y$. For a finite abelian group $G$ we're
interested in finding the largest cardinality of all subsets $A\subseteq
G$ with $A$ containing no 3-APs. We denote this cardinality by $D(G)$.
In this talk we will prove a result of Lev's showing how $D(G)$ can be
bounded above based on the structure of the group $G$.
Abstract: Proj, coherence, and O(1) are all scary things in Hartshorne section II.5. I’ll do my best to explain them, and make them seem less scary.
Spiro Karigiannis, Pure Mathematics Department, University of Waterloo will speak on:
Abstract: I will discuss natural classes of connections on almost Hermitian manifolds, including the Bismut connection. I will be following closely the hard-to-find paper by Paul Gauduchon entitled "Hermitian Connections and Dirac Operators".
Abstract: We will begin this talk by introducing universal
specializations (section 2.2.1 in Zilber), which are specializations
that behave very nicely when extended further. We will then discuss
irreducible coverings (section 3.5.2), and begin to show that an
We have seen the outline of the circle method in Waring's
problem from Shuntaro's talks, where the minor arc contribution was
established by combining Weyl's inequality with Hua's lemma. In my two
talks, we will continue to see some improvements on minor arc estimates.
The conjecture of Masser-Oesterl ́e, popularly known as abc-conjecture have many consequences. We use an explicit version due to Baker to solve a number of conjectures. This is a joint work with T. N. Shorey.
We will see why a ring homomorphism A → B naturally induces a morphism (SpecB,OB) → (Spec A, OA) and why the converse is also true.
Benoit Charbonneau & Ren Zhu, Pure Mathematics, University of Waterloo
This is the fourth, and hopefully last, of several lectures in which I will describe an algorithm for problems whose constraints are cosets of subgroups of powers of a fixed group.
In this talk, we will introduce a broader definition of
pre-smoothness for general constructible sets, and discuss some
properties of pre-smooth sets. Time permitting, we will also look at
the specific case when the pre-smooth set is an algebraic curve.
Departmental office: MC 5304
Phone: 519 888 4567 x43484
Fax: 519 725 0160
Email: puremath@uwaterloo.ca
The University of Waterloo acknowledges that much of our work takes place on the traditional territory of the Neutral, Anishinaabeg and Haudenosaunee peoples. Our main campus is situated on the Haldimand Tract, the land granted to the Six Nations that includes six miles on each side of the Grand River. Our active work toward reconciliation takes place across our campuses through research, learning, teaching, and community building, and is centralized within our Office of Indigenous Relations.