<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erenay, F.S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Alagoz, O.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Banerjee, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Said, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cima, R.R.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cancer</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.30091/full</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">122</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2560-2570</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;section class=&quot;article-section article-body-section&quot; id=&quot;cncr30091-sec-0001&quot;&gt;&lt;h3&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC) among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors varies significantly, and the optimal colonoscopy surveillance practice for mitigating MCRC incidence is unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;article-section article-body-section&quot; id=&quot;cncr30091-sec-0002&quot;&gt;&lt;h3&gt;METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;A cost-effectiveness analysis was used to compare the performances of the US Multi-Society Task Force guideline and all clinically reasonable colonoscopy surveillance strategies for 50- to 79-year-old posttreatment CRC patients with a computer simulation model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;article-section article-body-section&quot; id=&quot;cncr30091-sec-0004&quot;&gt;&lt;h3&gt;CONCLUSIONS&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The US guideline might be improved by a slight increase in the surveillance intensity at the expense of moderately increased cost. More research is warranted to explore the benefits/harms of such practices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/section&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></issue></record></records></xml>