<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Agyeman, Julian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">On belonging and becoming in the settler-colonial city: Co-produced futurities, placemaking, and urban planning in the United States</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26884674.2020.1793703</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">With a few notable exceptions, settler-colonial theory has not been applied to the study of U.S. cities and urban planning. Settler-colonial theory is a relatively new field of scholarship that interrogates the destruction of Indigenous laws, ways of knowing, and connections to place to make way for a new settler futurity. This futurity is particularly pronounced in cities, where Indigenous peoples have been rendered almost completely invisible and where their opportunities to shape urban development are highly circumscribed. We use settler-colonial theory, as well as Indigenous scholars’ responses to it, to extend ideas of&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;belonging&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;becoming&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;in urban planning and placemaking. We turn to the theory and practice of co-production as one possible intervention into how the relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous placemakers could be conceived and enacted in the urban environment.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thompson-Fawcett, Michelle</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Decolonizing the Boundaries between the &amp;lsquo;Planner&amp;rsquo; and the &amp;lsquo;Planned&amp;rsquo;: Implications of Indigenous Property Development</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Theory &amp; Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14649357.2020.1775874</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">410-425</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper examines Indigenous property development, drawing on research into the development of treaty settlement lands in Manitoba, Canada, and Canterbury, New Zealand. It highlights two contradicting ways of understanding this work: Indigenous peoples as self-determining, with authority to develop their own urban planning approaches, and Indigenous peoples as conventional property developers, subject to the same rules as any other private interest. This contradiction is used to expose a need for alternative, decolonial ways of understanding relationships between the ‘planner’ and the ‘planned’, grounded in the recognition of overlapping governance roles and responsibilities which Indigenous peoples are now (re)claiming in the urban environment.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Allan, Evan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chandran, Deepa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cook, James</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Curtis, Brittany</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kostyniuk, Ashley</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mikulec, Philip</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Searle, Meleana</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yau, Derek</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unsettling Notions of Planning Competence: Lessons from Studio-Based Learning with Indigenous Peoples</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Planning Education and Research</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0739456X19844571</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Drawing on the instructor and student experiences of a service-based learning course with Indigenous peoples, this paper considers how studios develop the skills and competencies outlined by accrediting bodies. Yet, this approach to teaching and learning can also unsettle students’ sense of professional competence and faith in the usefulness of conventional planning methods. In this case, unsettlement was a valuable and productive outcome that supported the development of a more critically reflective approach to working with Indigenous peoples and a newfound appreciation of the need to engage in disquieting conversations about the colonial underpinnings of the planning profession.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thompson-Fawcett, Michelle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kitson, Alex</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enhancing cultural aspirations in urban design: the gradual transformation by Indigenous innovation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urban Design International</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41289-018-0075-y</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1–9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the paper, we address the need to make visible the presence of Indigenous groups in the built environment that has developed on their traditional territories. We examine two recent approaches that have been used in Aotearoa New Zealand to manifest Indigenous histories and values in the city of Ōtautahi|Christchurch. The first involves the Indigenous group acting as urban developer. The second exemplifies Indigenous integration into local urban design decision-making processes. The result of both approaches is a significant urban transformation whereby Indigenous cultural aspirations are given voice in the city.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Horst, Megan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inch, Andy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Legacy, Crystal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rishi, Susmita</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rivero, Juan J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taufen, Anne</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zanotto, Juliana M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zitcer, Andrew</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Unsettling planning theory</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Theory</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1473095218763842</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">418–438</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Recent political developments in many parts of the world seem likely to exacerbate rather than ameliorate the planetary-scale challenges of social polarization, inequality and environmental change societies face. In this unconventional multi-authored essay, we therefore seek to explore some of the ways in which planning theory might respond to the deeply&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;unsettling&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;times we live in. Taking the multiple, suggestive possibilities of the theme of&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;unsettlement&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;as a starting point, we aim to create space for reflection and debate about the state of the discipline and practice of planning theory, questioning what it means to produce knowledge capable of acting on the world today. Drawing on exchanges at a workshop attended by a group of emerging scholars in Portland, Oregon in late 2016, the essay begins with an introduction section exploring the contemporary resonances of ‘unsettling’ in, of and for planning theory. This is followed by four, individually authored responses which each connect the idea of unsettlement to key challenges and possible future directions. We end by calling for a reflective practice of theorizing that accepts unsettlement but seeks to act knowingly and compassionately on the uneven terrain that it creates.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Government-to-Government Planning and the Recognition of Indigenous Rights and Title in the Central Coast Land and Resource Management Plan</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Canada: A Case Study Approach</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.oupcanada.com/catalog/9780199008070.html</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Oxford University Press Canada</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">168–175</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Not stakeholders in these parts: Indigenous peoples and urban planning</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Participatory City</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jovis</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23–29</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter, Libby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning for Coexistence? Recognizing Indigenous rights through land-use planning in Canada and Australia</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.routledge.com/Planning-for-Coexistence-Recognizing-Indigenous-rights-through-land-use/Porter-Barry/p/book/9781409470779</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">222</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning is becoming one of the key battlegrounds for Indigenous people to negotiate meaningful articulation of their sovereign territorial and political rights, reigniting the essential tension that lies at the heart of Indigenous-settler relations. But what actually happens in the planning contact zone - when Indigenous demands for recognition of coexisting political authority over territory intersect with environmental and urban land-use planning systems in settler-colonial states? This book answers that question through a critical examination of planning contact zones in two settler-colonial states: Victoria, Australia and British Columbia, Canada. Comparing the experiences of four Indigenous communities who are challenging and renegotiating land-use planning in these places, the book breaks new ground in our understanding of contemporary Indigenous land justice politics. It is the first study to grapple with what it means for planning to engage with Indigenous peoples in major cities, and the first of its kind to compare the underlying conditions that produce very different outcomes in urban and non-urban planning contexts. In doing so, the book exposes the costs and limits of the liberal mode of recognition as it comes to be articulated through planning, challenging the received wisdom that participation and consultation can solve conflicts of sovereignty. This book lays the theoretical, methodological and practical groundwork for imagining what planning for coexistence might look like: a relational, decolonizing planning praxis where self-determining Indigenous peoples invite settler-colonial states to their planning table on their terms.</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter, Libby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bounded recognition: urban planning and the textual mediation of Indigenous rights in Canada and Australia</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical Policy Studies</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taylor &amp; Francis</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22–40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">From British City Centre to British Columbia’s Central Coast: The Transferability of the Institutional Capacity Development Framework</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Connections: Exploring Contemporary Planning Theory and Practice with Patsy Healey</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">313</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter, Libby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slade, Christine</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Butt, Andrew</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rosier, Jo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Perkins, Tim</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crookes, Lee</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inch, Andy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slade, Jason</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bassa, Faranaaz</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Petzer, Brett</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">others</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Partnerships of learning for planning education Who is learning what from whom? The beautiful messiness of learning partnerships/Experiential learning partnerships in Australian and New Zealand higher education planning programmes/Res non verba? rediscove</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Theory &amp; Practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taylor &amp; Francis</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">409–434</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter, Libby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning with Indigenous Customary Land Rights: An Investigation of Shifts in Planning Law and Governance in British Columbia, Canada and Victoria, Australia: Final Project Report</style></title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economic and Social Research Council</style></publisher><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saarikoski, Heli</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raitio, Kaisa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Understanding ‘successful’conflict resolution: policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Land Use Policy</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elsevier</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">32</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">271–280</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Porter, Libby</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Theory</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">170–187</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indigenous state planning as inter-institutional capacity development: The evolution of “government-to-government” relations in coastal British Columbia, Canada</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning theory &amp; practice</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taylor &amp; Francis Group</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">213–231</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice M</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mobilized bias and multistakeholder protected-area planning: a socio-institutional perspective on collaboration</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Society &amp; Natural Resources</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taylor &amp; Francis</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1116–1126</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>10</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Challenges of Collaborative Land-Use Planning: A Case Study of the Kawartha Highlands Signature Site</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Planning Northern Parks and Protected Areas. Parks and Protected Areas Research in Ontario, Proceedings of the Parks Research Forum of Ontario</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">221–227</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barry, Janice</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Collaborative natural resource management and its applicability to protected area planning</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parks Research Forum of Ontario (PRFO)</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record></records></xml>