<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kate Ricke</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jacob Schewe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anders Levermann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ken Caldeira</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Juan Moreno-Cruz</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Policy thresholds in mitigation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature Geoscience</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2607</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5-6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Some climate change impacts rise fast with little warming, and then taper off. To avoid diminishing incentives to reduce emissions and inadvertently slipping into a lower-welfare world, mitigation policy needs to be ambitious early on.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record></records></xml>