What’s going on inside the minds of climate change skeptics?
Waterloo research team creates mapping tool that identifies emotional hotspots in disputes
Waterloo research team creates mapping tool that identifies emotional hotspots in disputesBy Heather Bean Marketing and Strategic Communications
Science has shown that humans are influencing climate change, but according to a recent poll almost half of Americans don’t believe we’re affecting the Earth’s climate.
Why do people and politicians cling so tightly to beliefs that don’t stand up to science and reason?
“It’s important to understand what’s happening to our climate, but we also have to look at what’s going on in people’s minds to understand why it continues to happen,” says Steven Mock, a research fellow at the Balsillie School of International Affairs (BSIA). “Emotional hotspots are key to understanding why people hold onto beliefs not supported by evidence.”
Mock, along with a team of researchers based in Waterloo, recently published a paper called The Conceptual Structure of Social Disputes describing how a tool called Cognitive Affective Maps (CAMs) can be used to help resolve conflicts. CAMs look at the emotions behind our ideologies and beliefs.
The research team included Balsillie School Professor Thomas Homer-Dixon, and Killam Prize scholar Paul Thagard, who is also director of the University of Waterloo’s Cognitive Science program. Manjana Milkoreit, a Balsillie School doctoral graduate and Tobias Schröeder a recent Waterloo postdoctoral fellow were also part of the team.
The paper examines how CAMs can be used in four different disputes:
CAMs have potential as a tool for negotiators, because they help identify “what it is that people really are emotional about in a situation,” says Mock. “Our argument is that what goes on in people’s minds—the beliefs that are shared by communities and societies—are in their own ways complex systems.”
CAMs are visual representations of the way people feel about their ideas. Using networks of coloured shapes, CAMs portray related ideas and concepts in a belief system and the positive or negative valence or direction of emotion associated with various ideas.
Anyone can make a CAM: individuals can represent their own values, or negotiators can compare the CAMs of parties in conflict to find points of agreement or tension with a software program called Empathica.
The Waterloo team will host a workshop later this year with negotiation practitioners to find ways to further develop CAMs as a tool for dispute resolution.