@inproceedings {328, title = {Combining AMSR-E and QuikSCAT image data to improve sea ice classification}, booktitle = {5th Workshop on Pattern Recognition for Remote Sensing}, year = {2008}, month = {12/2008}, address = {Tampa, Florida, USA}, abstract = {

The benefits of augmenting AMSR-E image data with QuikSCAT image data for supervised sea ice classification in the Western Arctic region are investigated. Experiments compared the performance of a maximum likelihood classifier when used with the AMSR-E only data set against the combined data and examined the preferred number of features to use as well as the reliability of training data over time. Adding QuikSCAT often improves classifier accuracy in a statistically significant manner and never decreased it significantly when enough features are used. Combining these data sets is beneficial for sea ice mapping. Using all available features is recommended and training data from a specific date remains reliable within 30 days.

}, keywords = {AMSR-E image data, classifier accuracy, hydrological techniques, image classification, maximum likelihood classifier, maximum likelihood estimation, QuikSCAT image data, sea ice, supervised sea ice classification, terrain mapping, Western Arctic region}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PRRS.2008.4783170}, author = {P Yu and D A. Clausi and R De Abreu and T Agnew} } @inproceedings {394, title = {Joint image segmentation and interpretation using iterative semantic region growing on SAR sea ice imagery}, booktitle = {18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)}, year = {2006}, month = {08/2006}, address = {Hong Kong}, abstract = {

Segmentation of images into disjoint regions and interpretation of the regions for semantic meanings are two central tasks in an image analysis system. Typically, the segmentation and interpretation are performed separately with the interpretation as a post processing of segmentation. In this paper, we use an iterative method that keeps refining the segmentation and producing semantic class labels at the same time. The segmentation algorithm is based on a region growing technique and the interpretation is a Markov random field (MRF) based classification. The two processes are integrated under the Bayesian framework, with both aiming at reducing a defined energy. The interactions between the two are bidirectional by letting the interpretation result have some degree of control on the region growing process. Various features can hence be efficiently combined, and accurate classifications are obtained for operational synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice applications

}, keywords = {Bayes methods, Bayesian framework, image analysis, image classification, image interpretation, image segmentation, iterative methods, iterative semantic region growing, Markov processes, Markov random field based classification, radar imaging, SAR sea ice imagery, sea ice, semantic class labels, synthetic aperture radar, terrain mapping}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2006.734}, author = {Q Yu and D A. Clausi} } @inproceedings {592, title = {An advanced computational method to determine co-occurrence probability texture features}, booktitle = {IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2002}, abstract = {

A critical shortcoming of determining co-occurrence probability texture features using Haralick\&$\#$39;s popular grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) is the excessive computational burden. Here, a more robust algorithm (the grey level cooccurrence integrated algorithm or GLCIA) to perform this task is presented. The GLCIA is created by integrating the preferred aspects of two algorithms: the grey level cooccurrence hybrid structure (GLCHS) and the grey level cooccurrence hybrid histogram (GLCHH). The GLCHS utilizes a dedicated 2-d data structure to quickly generate the probabilities and apply statistics to generate the features. The GLCHH uses a more efficient 1-d data structure to perform the same tasks. Since the GLCHH is faster than the GLCHS yet the GLCHH is not able to calculate features using all available statistics, the integration of these two methods generates a superior algorithm (the GLCIA). The computational gains vary as a function of window size, quantization level, and statistics selected. The GLCIA computational time relative to that of the standard GLCM method ranges from 0.04\% to 16\%. The GLCIA is a highly recommended technique for anyone wishing to calculate co-occurrence probability texture features, especially from large-scale digital imagery.

}, keywords = {algorithm, co-occurrence probability, co-occurrence probability texture features, Feature Extraction, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, GLCHH, GLCHS, GLCIA, grey level co occurrence hybrid histogram, grey level co occurrence hybrid structure, grey level co occurrence integrated algorithm, image texture, land surface, Remote Sensing, terrain mapping, texture feature}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026575}, author = {D A. Clausi and Y Zhao} } @inproceedings {449, title = {An advanced computational method to determine co-occurrence probability texture features}, booktitle = {IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2002}, abstract = {

A critical shortcoming of determining co-occurrence probability texture features using Haralick\&$\#$39;s popular grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) is the excessive computational burden. Here, a more robust algorithm (the grey level cooccurrence integrated algorithm or GLCIA) to perform this task is presented. The GLCIA is created by integrating the preferred aspects of two algorithms: the grey level cooccurrence hybrid structure (GLCHS) and the grey level cooccurrence hybrid histogram (GLCHH). The GLCHS utilizes a dedicated 2-d data structure to quickly generate the probabilities and apply statistics to generate the features. The GLCHH uses a more efficient 1-d data structure to perform the same tasks. Since the GLCHH is faster than the GLCHS yet the GLCHH is not able to calculate features using all available statistics, the integration of these two methods generates a superior algorithm (the GLCIA). The computational gains vary as a function of window size, quantization level, and statistics selected. The GLCIA computational time relative to that of the standard GLCM method ranges from 0.04\% to 16\%. The GLCIA is a highly recommended technique for anyone wishing to calculate co-occurrence probability texture features, especially from large-scale digital imagery.

}, keywords = {algorithm, co-occurrence probability, co-occurrence probability texture features, Feature Extraction, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, GLCHH, GLCHS, GLCIA, grey level co occurrence hybrid histogram, grey level co occurrence hybrid structure, grey level co occurrence integrated algorithm, image texture, land surface, Remote Sensing, terrain mapping, texture feature}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026575}, author = {D A. Clausi and Y Zhao} } @inproceedings {593, title = {Automatic registration of SAR and visible band remote sensing images}, booktitle = {Joint IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium and 24th Canadian Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2002}, abstract = {

Image registration is one of the basic image processing operations in remote sensing. With an increasing number of images collected every day from different sensors, automated registration of multi-sensor/multi-spectral images has become an important issue. A wide range of registration techniques exists for different types of applications and data sources, however no algorithm is known that can accurately register multi-source images consistently. This research addresses this problem by investigating the development of a fully automatic registration system for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical remote sensing images. The development of this new automatic image registration method is based on the extraction and matching of common features that are visible in both images. The algorithm involves the following five steps: noise removal, edge extraction, edge linking pattern extraction and pattern matching. The application of the developed automatic image registration model to SAR and optical image pairs showed that accurate ground control points (GCPs) could be identified automatically.

}, keywords = {algorithm, edge extraction, edge linking pattern extraction, fully automatic registration, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, image registration, land surface, multi-source image, noise removal, optical imaging, pattern matching, radar imaging, radar remote sensing, Remote Sensing, remote sensing by radar, remote sensing image, SAR, sensor fusion, synthetic aperture radar, terrain mapping, visible band}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026106}, author = {M Ali and D A. Clausi} } @inproceedings {594, title = {Data fusion of SSM/I channels using multiresolution wavelet transform}, booktitle = {IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2002}, abstract = {

This paper presents an approach to the fusion of SSM/I (Special Sensor Microwave/Imager) data from different resolutions, based on the prior statistical information about the data. The result is an estimated field that lives in a finer scale than any of the measurements. We apply a Wavelet Transform that increases speed and decreases memory requirements by sparsifying and preconditioning the statistics. This approach makes feasible the use of reprogrammable FPGA implementations for onboard satellite data processing, which greatly enhances flexibility and, most importantly, reduces communication burdens by limiting the extent to which raw, unprocessed data are transmitted to the ground.

}, keywords = {19 to 85.5 GHz, atmosphere, atmospheric techniques, EHF, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, image fusion, land surface, meteorology, microwave radiometry, multiresolution wavelet transform, ocean, oceanographic techniques, preconditioning, prior statistical information, satellite remote sensing, sea surface, sensor fusion, SHF, sparsifying, Special Sensor Microwave/Imager, SSM/I, statistics, terrain mapping, wavelet transforms}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026564}, author = {V K. Mehta and C M. Hammock and P Fieguth and H Krim} } @inproceedings {566, title = {Rapid determination of co-occurrence texture features}, booktitle = {IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2001}, abstract = {

Typically, the co-occurrence features for image processing are calculated-by using a grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). This method is computationally intensive since the matrix is usually sparse leading to many unnecessary calculations involving zero probabilities. An improvement on the GLCM method is to utilize a grey level co-occurrence linked list (GLCLL) to store only the non-zero co-occurring probabilities. The GLCLL suffers since, to achieve preferred computational speeds, the list should be sorted. This paper presents a grey level co-occurrence hybrid structure (GLCHS) based on an integrated hash table and linked list approach. Texture features obtained using this technique are identical to those obtained using the GLCM and GLCLL. Based on a Brodatz test image, the GLCHS method is demonstrated to be a superior technique when compared across various window sizes and grey level quantizations. The GLCHS method required, on average, 33.4\% of the computational time ( sigma;=3.08\%) required by the GLCLL. Significant computational gains are made using the GLCHS method

}, keywords = {Brodatz test image, co-occurrence features, co-occurrence texture feature, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, grey level co-occurrence hybrid structure, grey level co-occurrence linked list, grey level co-occurrence matrix, image processing, image texture, integrated hash table, land surface, linked list, Remote Sensing, terrain mapping}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2001.977103}, author = {D A. Clausi and Y Zhao} } @inproceedings {448, title = {Using the Canny edge detector for feature extraction and enhancement of remote sensing images}, booktitle = {IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2001}, abstract = {

Edges are important features in an image since they represent significant local intensity changes. They provide important clues to separate regions within an object or to identify changes in illumination. Most remote sensing applications, such as image registration, image segmentation, region separation, object description, and recognition, use edge detection as a preprocessing stage for feature extraction. Real images, such as remote sensing images, can be corrupted with point noise. The real problem is how to enhance noisy remote sensing images and simultaneously extract the edges. Using the implemented Canny edge detector for feature extraction and as an enhancement tool for remote sensing images, the result was robust with a very high enhancement level

}, keywords = {Canny edge detector, edge detection, enhancement, Feature Extraction, geophysical signal processing, illumination, image enhancement, local intensity changes, noise, point noise, preprocessing stage, real images, remote sensing images, terrain mapping}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2001.977981}, author = {M Ali and D A. Clausi} } @inproceedings {503, title = {Multiresolution Network Flow Phase Unwrapping}, booktitle = {IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {2000}, abstract = {

Phase unwrapping is a key step in deriving topographic information from interferometric SAR. Several recent methods are based on a minimum cost network flow approach. The authors develop a new, computationally efficient, ldquo;divide-and-conquer rdquo; strategy for phase unwrapping

}, keywords = {divide and conquer methods, divide-and-conquer method, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical techniques, InSAR, interferometric SAR, land surface topography, multiresolution network flow phase unwrapping, phase unwrapping, radar remote sensing, radar theory, remote sensing by radar, synthetic aperture radar, terrain mapping, topography (Earth)}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2000.861693}, author = {G F Carballo and P Fieguth} } @inproceedings {513, title = {Probabilistic cost functions for network flow phase unwrapping}, booktitle = {IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium}, year = {1999}, abstract = {

Phase unwrapping is a key step in deriving topographic information from interferometric SAR. A recent method is based on minimizing the total weighted length of branch cuts by computing the minimum cost flow on a network. The authors provide a theoretical foundation to derive the network weights based on a probabilistic approach

}, keywords = {branch cuts, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical techniques, InSAR, interferometric SAR, land surface topography, minimizing, minimum cost flow, network flow phase unwrapping, network weights, probabilistic approach, probabilistic cost function, radar imaging, radar remote sensing, radar theory, remote sensing by radar, SAR, synthetic aperture radar, terrain mapping, theoretical foundation, topographic mapping, topography (Earth), total weighted length}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1999.772009}, author = {G F Carballo and P Fieguth} } @article {471, title = {A fast method to determine co-occurrence texture features}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing}, volume = {36}, year = {1998}, pages = {298 - 300}, abstract = {

A critical shortcoming of determining texture features derived from grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM\&$\#$39;s) is the excessive computational burden. This paper describes the implementation of a linked-list algorithm to determine co-occurrence texture features far more efficiently. Behavior of common co-occurrence texture features across difference grey-level quantizations is investigated

}, keywords = {co-occurrence texture feature, fast method, Feature Extraction, geophysical measurement technique, geophysical signal processing, geophysical techniques, grey-level co-occurrence matrices, grey-level quantization, image feature, image processing, image texture, land surface, linked-list algorithm, occurrence matrix, Remote Sensing, terrain mapping}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.655338}, author = {D A. Clausi and E Jernigan} }