research-article

Left Them 4 Dead: Perception of Humans versus Non-Player Character Teammates in Cooperative Gameplay

Authors:

Lennart E. NackeAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

Pages 403 - 415

https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064712

Published: 10 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Why do we care if our teammates are not human? This study seeks to uncover whether or not the perception of other players as human or artificial entities can influence player experience. We use both deception and a between-participants blind study design to reduce bias in our experiment. Our qualitative results show that people do care about the perceived nature of other players, even though they are not always able to correctly identify them as human or as non-player character teammates. Interview data suggest believing that one is playing with other humans can positively affect a player's subjective experience. Furthermore, our qualitative results indicate that players view their non-player character teammates as humanized entities, but adopt a neo-feudalistic (i.e., an unequal rights) view of them. Based on our results, we establish game design guide- lines for non-player character teammates leading to stronger, emotional human-computer relationships in video games.

References

[1]

Raul Arrabales, Agapito Ledezma, and Araceli Sanchis. 2009. Towards conscious-like behavior in computer game characters. CIG2009 - 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (2009), 217--224.

Digital Library

[2]

Jaime Banks and Nicholas David Bowman. 2016. Emotion, anthropomorphism, realism, control: Validation of a merged metric for player-avatar interaction (PAX). Computers in Human Behavior 54 (2016), 215--223.

Digital Library

[3]

Anton Bogdanovych, Simeon Simoff, Marc Esteva, and John Debenham. 2008. Teaching autonomous agents to move in a believable manner within virtual institutions. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 276 (2008), 55--64.

[4]

Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative Emotion, Positive Experience? Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (2016), 2996--3006.

Digital Library

[5]

David M Bourg and Glenn Seemann. 2004. AI for game developers. O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Digital Library

[6]

Mat Buckland. 2005. Programming game AI by example. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

[7]

Shira Chess and Adrienne Shaw. 2015. A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about# GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59, 1 (2015), 208--220.

[8]

Juliet M Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology 13, 1 (1990), 3--21.

[9]

Mihalyi Csikszentlmihalyi. 1990. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.

[10]

Yvonne A. W. De Kort and Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn. 2008. People, places, and play. Computers in Entertainment 6, 2 (2008), 1.

Digital Library

[11]

Ansgar E Depping, Regan L Mandryk, Chengzhao Li, Carl Gutwin, and Rodrigo Vicencio-Moreira. 2016. How Disclosing Skill Assistance Affects Play Experience in a Multiplayer First-Person Shooter Game. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), 3462--3472.

Digital Library

[12]

Stephen R Donaldson. 1986. Epic Fantasy in the Modern World. Kent, OH: Kent State University Libraries (1986).

[13]

Nicolas Ducheneaut, Nicholas Yee, Eric Nickell, and Robert J. Moore. 2007. The Life and Death of Online Gaming Communities: A Look at Guilds in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 839--848.

Digital Library

[14]

M. E. Ellithorpe, D. R. Ewoldsen, and K. Porreca. 2015. Die, Foul Creature! How the Supernatural Genre Affects Attitudes Toward Outgroups Through Strength of Human Identity. Communication Research September (2015).

[15]

Jesse Fox, Sun Joo Ahn, Joris H Janssen, Leo Yeykelis, Kathryn Y Segovia, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2015. Avatars versus agents: a meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence. Human--Computer Interaction 30, 5 (2015), 401--432.

Digital Library

[16]

Johan Hagelbäck and Stefan J. Johansson. 2010. A study on human like characteristics in real time strategy games. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG2010 (2010), 139--145.

[17]

Kiran Ijaz, Anton Bogdanovych, and Simeon Simo. 2011. Enhancing the believability of embodied conversational agents through environment-, self- and interaction-awareness. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series 113, Acsc (2011), 107--116.

Digital Library

[18]

Katherine Isbister. 2006. Better Game Characters by Design: A Psychological Approach (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive 3D Technology). 368 pages.

Digital Library

[19]

Katherine Isbister, Hideyuki Nakanishi, Toru Ishida, and Cliff Nass. 2000. Helper agent. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '00 January (2000), 57--64.

Digital Library

[20]

Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Madison Clark, and Christopher Watling. 2015. Cooperative Game Play with Avatars and Agents: Differences in Brain Activity and the Experience of Play. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. 3721--3730.

Digital Library

[21]

Lilian Juma. 2008. The Role of secondary emotions in Action Selection and its Effects on the Believability of a Character. (2008), 137.

[22]

Dennis L. Kappen, Pejman Mirza-Babaei, Jens Johannsmeier, Daniel Buckstein, James Robb, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2014. Engaged by boos and cheers. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play - CHI PLAY '14. Toronto, Canada, 151--160.

Digital Library

[23]

Petri Lankoski and Staffan Björk. 2007. Gameplay design patterns for believable non-player characters. In Situated Play: Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference. 416--423.

[24]

Christopher Lee, Peta Wyeth, Daniel Johnson, and Joshua Hall. 2015. Flow during Individual and Co-operative Gameplay. Proceedings of Computer-human Interaction in Play - CHI Play'15 (2015), 103--107.

Digital Library

[25]

Sohye Lim and Byron Reeves. 2010. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1 (2010), 57--68.

Digital Library

[26]

Jonas Linderoth, Staffan Björk, and Camilla Olsson. 2012. Should I stay or should I go-Boundary maintaining mechanisms in Left 4 Dead 2. In Proceedings of.

[27]

Ian J. Livingston, Carl Gutwin, Regan L. Mandryk, and Max Birk. 2014. How Players Value Their Characters in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1333--1343.

Digital Library

[28]

Daniel Livingstone. 2006. Turing's test and believable AI in games. Computers in Entertainment 4, 1 (2006), 6.

Digital Library

[29]

Linbo Luo, Suiping Zhou, Wentong Cai, Malcolm Yoke, Hean Low, Feng Tian, Yongwei Wang, Xian Xiao, and Dan Chen. 2008. Agent-based human behavior modeling for crowd simulation. Computer Animation And Virtual Worlds 19, August (2008), 271--281.

Digital Library

[30]

Regan L. Mandryk, Kori M. Inkpen, and Thomas W. Calvert. 2006. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (mar 2006), 141--158.

[31]

Raymond A. Mar and Keith Oatley. 2008. The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 3 (2008), 173--192.

[32]

Raymond A. Mar, Keith Oatley, Jacob Hirsh, Jennifer dela Paz, and Jordan B. Peterson. 2006. Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality 40, 5 (2006), 694--712.

[33]

Tim Merritt and Kevin McGee. 2012. Protecting Artificial Team-mates: More Seems Like Less. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2793--2802.

Digital Library

[34]

Maxim Mozgovoy and Iskander Umarov. 2010. Building a believable and effective agent for a 3D boxing simulation game. Proceedings - 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, ICCSIT 2010 3, 2 (2010), 14--18.

[35]

Maxim Mozgovoy and Iskander Umarov. 2011. Behavior Capture: Building Believable and Effective AI Agents for Video Games. International Journal of Arts and Sciences (2011). http://web-ext.u-aizu.ac.jp/

[36]

Florian Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, and Frank Vetere. 2010. Towards understanding how to design for social play in exertion games. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 5 (jan 2010), 417--424.

Digital Library

[37]

Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. 1994. Computers Are Social Actors. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 204--.

Digital Library

[38]

Magalie Ochs, Nicolas Sabouret, and Vincent Corruble. 2009. Simulation of the dynamics of nonplayer characters' emotions and social relations in games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 1, 4 (2009), 281--297.

[39]

Marc Ponsen and Pieter Spronck. 2004. Improving Adaptive Game AI with Evolutionary Learning. Proceedings of the Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education Conference Manslow 2002 (2004), 389--396.

[40]

Mike Preuss, Nicola Beume, Holger Danielsiek, Tobias Hein, Boris Naujoks, Nico Piatkowski, Raphael Stüer, Andreas Thom, and Simon Wessing. 2010. Towards intelligent team composition and maneuvering in real-time strategy games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 2, 2 (2010), 82--98.

[41]

Steffen Priesterjahn. 2007. Imitation-based evolution of artificial game players. ACM SIGEVOlution 2, 4 (2007), 2--13.

Digital Library

[42]

Niklas Ravaja, Timo Saari, Marko Turpeinen, Jari Laarni, Mikko Salminen, and Matias Kivikangas. 2006. Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 4 (2006), 381--392.

Digital Library

[43]

Gabriela T Richard. 2015. Intersecting vulnerabilities in game culture: the effects of inequities and stereotype threat on player confidence, identification and persistence across gender and race. In Proceedings of DiGRA.

[44]

Adam Roberts. 2002. Science fiction. Routledge.

[45]

Robert Rosenthal. 1973. The Pygmalion Effect Lives. Psychology Today (1973).

[46]

Pieter Spronck, Ida Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, and Eric Postma. 2004. Difficulty scaling of game AI. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation (GAMEON'2004) (2004), 33--37.

[47]

Jaakko Stenros, Janne Paavilainen, and Frans Mäyrä. 2009. The Many Faces of Sociability and Social Play in Games. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (MindTrek '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 82--89.

Digital Library

[48]

Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research 17 (1994), 273--85.

[49]

Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage.

[50]

Christine Szentgyorgyi, Michael Terry, and Edward Lank. 2008. Renegade Gaming: Practices Surrounding Social Use of the Nintendo DS Handheld Gaming System. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1463--1472.

Digital Library

[51]

Gustavo F. Tondello, Rina R. Wehbe, Zachary O. Toups, Lennart E. Nacke, and Nicole K. Crenshaw. 2015. Understanding Player Attitudes Towards Digital Game Objects. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 709--714.

Digital Library

[52]

Alan M. Turing. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 236 (1950), 433--460.

[53]

Deepika Vaddi, Zachary Toups, Igor Dolgov, Rina Wehbe, and Lennart Nacke. 2016. Investigating the Impact of Cooperative Communication Mechanics on Player Performance in Portal 2. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2016 (GI 2016). Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société canadienne du dialogue humain-machine, 41--48.

Digital Library

[54]

Deepika Vaddi, Rina R. Wehbe, Zachary O. Toups, Samantha N Stahlke, Rylan Koroluk, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2015. Validating Test Chambers to Study Cooperative Communication Mechanics in Portal 2. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 721--726.

Digital Library

[55]

Amy Voida and Saul Greenberg. 2009. Wii All Play: The Console Game As a Computational Meeting Place. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1559--1568.

Digital Library

[56]

Henrik Warpefelt. 2016. The Non-Player Character : Exploring the believability of NPC presentation and behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation. Stockholm University, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences.

[57]

Henrik Warpefelt, Magnus Johansson, and Harko Verhagen. 2013. Analyzing the believability of game character behavior using the Game Agent Matrix. In Proceedings of DIGRA. 70--81.

[58]

Henrik Warpefelt and Björn Strååt. 2013. Anti-heuristics for maintaining immersion through believable non-player characters. In FDG. 455--456.

[59]

Rina R. Wehbe. 2014. Evaluating Social and Cognitive Effects of Video Games using Electroencephalography. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT). http://hdl.handle.net/10155/460

[60]

Rina R. Wehbe, Dennis L. Kappen, David Rojas, Matthias Klauser, Bill Kapralos, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2013. EEG-based assessment of video and in-game learning. Proc. CHI'13 Extended Abstracts (2013).

Digital Library

[61]

Rina R. Wehbe and Lennart E. Nacke. 2015. Towards Understanding the Importance of Co-Located Gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 733--738.

Digital Library

[62]

David Weibel, Bartholomäus Wissmath, Stephan Habegger, Yves Steiner, and Rudolf Groner. 2008. Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5 (sep 2008), 2274--2291.

Digital Library

[63]

Dmitri Williams, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Li Xiong, Yuanyuan Zhang, Nick Yee, and Eric Nickell. 2006. From Tree House to Barracks. Games and Culture 1, 4 (2006), 338--361.

[64]

Geogios N. Yannakakis. 2012. Game AI Revisited. Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computing Frontiers (2012), 285--292.

Digital Library

[65]

Rina R. Wehbe Gustavo F. Tondello Zachary O. Toups, Nicole K. Crenshaw and Lennart E. Nacke. 2016. "The Collecting Itself Feels Good": Towards Collection Interfaces for Digital Game Objects. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16. ACM, Austin, TX, USA. LUDOGRAPHY 1. Majesco, 505 Games. 2008. Zumba Fitness. Game {Wii}. (2008). Majesco Entertainment, Edison, New Jersey, USA. 2. Valve Corporation. 2008. Left4Dead. Game {Windows, Xbox 360, OS X}. (2008). Valve Corporation, Bellevue, Washington, USA. 3. Valve Corporation. 2009. Left4Dead. Game {Windows, Xbox 360, OS X}, Linux. (2009). Valve Corporation, Bellevue, Washington, USA.

Digital Library

Cited By

Chung HHolder TShah JYang X(2024)Developing a Team Classification Scheme for Human-Agent TeamingProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/1071181324126038768:1(1394-1399)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260387
Anvari SHammer JWehbe R(2024)"More than just a game, it's an app that builds awareness around Mental Health": Mental Health Stigma Reduction Using Games for ChangeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770908:CHI PLAY(1-30)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677090
Sidji MSmith WRogerson M(2024)Human-AI Collaboration in Cooperative Games: A Study of Playing Codenames with an LLM AssistantProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770818:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677081
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Left Them 4 Dead: Perception of Humans versus Non-Player Character Teammates in Cooperative Gameplay
1. Applied computing
  1. Computers in other domains
    1. Personal computers and PC applications
2. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Left 4 Dead: The Sacrifice
SIGGRAPH '11: ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Computer Animation Festival

From Valve (the creators of Counter-Strike, Half-Life and more) comes Left 4 Dead, a co-op action horror game for the PC and Xbox 360 that casts up to four players in an epic struggle for survival against swarming zombie hordes and terrifying mutant ...
BoomChaCha: A Rhythm-based, Physical Role-Playing Game that Facilitates Cooperation among Players
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We designed a new genre of gaming that is rhythm-based, cooperative, physical and involves role-playing. In the game, three players as a team combat monsters by waving physical weapons on certain beats of the background music. The game requires a ...
Social Experience in World of Warcraft: Technological and Ideological Mediations
CHI PLAY Companion '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts

I analyze social experience in World of Warcraft (WoW), one of the longest running massively multiplayer online games (MMO). Changes to WoW intended to streamline aspects of gameplay, such as time required to play and level of difficulty in play, ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

June 2017

1444 pages

ISBN:9781450349222

DOI:10.1145/3064663

General Chair:
Oli Mival
Edinburgh Napier University, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Michael Smyth
Edinburgh Napier University, UK
,
Peter Dalsgaard
Aarhus University, Denmark

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

DIS '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '17: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2017

June 10 - 14, 2017

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

DIS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 487 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

DIS '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 5 - 9, 2025

Funchal , Portugal

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

20
Total Citations
View Citations
560
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)62
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Chung HHolder TShah JYang X(2024)Developing a Team Classification Scheme for Human-Agent TeamingProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/1071181324126038768:1(1394-1399)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241260387
Anvari SHammer JWehbe R(2024)"More than just a game, it's an app that builds awareness around Mental Health": Mental Health Stigma Reduction Using Games for ChangeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770908:CHI PLAY(1-30)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677090
Sidji MSmith WRogerson M(2024)Human-AI Collaboration in Cooperative Games: A Study of Playing Codenames with an LLM AssistantProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770818:CHI PLAY(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677081
Lobo IKoch JRenoux JBatina IPrada R(2024)When Should I Lead or Follow: Understanding Initiative Levels in Human-AI Collaborative GameplayProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661583(2037-2056)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661583
Munyaka IAshktorab ZDugan CJohnson JPan Q(2023)Decision Making Strategies and Team Efficacy in Human-AI TeamsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794767:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579476
Gandhi K(2023)Cool Little Playable Things: Supporting Transformational Games Outside Formal ContextsCompanion Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3573382.3616032(318-321)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573382.3616032
Scott ANeumann DNiess JWoźniak P(2023)Do You Mind? User Perceptions of Machine ConsciousnessProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581296(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581296
Zheng CWu YShi CMa SLuo JMa X(2023)Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-MakingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581131(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581131
Kosch TWelsch RChuang LSchmidt A(2023)The Placebo Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Human–Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/352922529:6(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3529225
Darban M(2023)The future of virtual team learning: navigating the intersection of AI and educationJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2023.2288912(1-17)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2288912
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten