Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake

Saturday, December 24, 2011

What on Earth volume 7 2011

A personal account of the Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake

By John Motz Photographs
By John and Heather Motz, except where otherwise indicated.
On February 22, 2011, at 12:51 pm, our winter vacation in Christchurch New Zealand ended calamitously. At that moment I was huddled against a bank counter, wondering if the building would collapse, and my wife, Heather, was running screaming from her Skype call with her son in Canada. All around us, the city of Christchurch was being destroyed.
We were experiencing a magnitude 6.3 earthquake, which was an aftershock of a magnitude 7.1 quake that occurred on September 4, 2010. Although the February 22 shake lasted for only about 12 seconds, the effect was devastating: more than 180 people were killed; it is estimated that 10,000 homes in the area may have to be demolished and another 100,000 suffered damage; almost half of the buildings in the central city were either destroyed or badly damaged, leaving many businesses with nowhere to operate.
damaged street with people

Figure 1: The corner of Colombo and St. Asaph streets, half a block from our apartment, about an hour after the earthquake. This is a view looking north on Colombo Street. Compare this image to Figure 5, which was taken 10 days later.

After the earthquake, everyone was evacuated from the bank. It was only when I was outside on Colombo Street, one of the main streets in town, did the extent of the damage become apparent. Buildings on either side of the street had collapsed onto the road and dust hung in the air. My first thoughts were for Heather, who I knew was in our apartment in a century-old brick building, about half a kilometre away. Using my cellphone, I tried to reach her on our home phone and her cellphone, but the cityʼs communications infrastructure was damaged and overloaded, so I couldnʼt get through.
I ran home through the rubble in the streets and was relieved when I got to our corner and saw that our building was standing and Heather was outside with our earthquake emergency bag, containing clothes food and water. After returning to the apartment to retrieve our passports, airline tickets and a few other essentials, we were able to contact our families in Canada, to let them know we were safe. We then started to take stock of the situation.
damaged building with construction workers talking in front of it

Figure 2: Our building as it was in mid January. The building to the right was demolished after it collapsed as a result of the September 4 earthquake. The work crew in the foreground is preparing to repair a broken watermain.

The city was in chaos, with people wandering through the rubble and the streets packed with cars trying to get out of town. Traffic signals were out of operation and many roads were impassible because of damage and debris, so the city was one big traffic jam. Streets were coated in a mixture of liquefaction clay and sewage from ruptured pipes, which had oozed out of cracks in the roads. Helicopters circled above, surveying the damage. The plume of smoke from a burning building a few blocks north of us attracted a helicopter with a water-filled monsoon bucket trying to douse the flames.
Although we were safe for the moment, it was clear our apartment was possibly unsafe and definitely uninhabitable, so we had to leave the city centre to get to friends in the suburbs. We moved our car from the garage into the parking lot, but because of the traffic we didnʼt think we would get very far. We didnʼt have a radio to find out what was going on and there were no civil defense officials to give instructions, since they were all busy with critical emergencies. We were left to fend for ourselves, along with just about everyone else.
Eventually we decided to risk trying to get out by car and, although we were slowed down by heavy traffic and closed roads, we got to the home of friends, about 5 km from the centre of town, relatively quickly. Crossing a cracked bridge over railway tracks during an aftershock was a bit exciting though.

Geology

Sitting astride the convergent plate boundary between the Pacific and Australian plates, New Zealand is riven with faults and subject to frequent earthquakes and volcanism. In the north island and the northern part of the south island, the Pacific Plate is being subducted under the Australian Plate (Figure 3). Through most of the south island the western part of the island is moving south relative to the east along the Alpine Fault, forming the Southern Alps. From the southwest of the south island southwards the Pacific Plate overrides the Australian Plate.
Major New Zealand faults map

Figure 3: Major New Zealand faults (modified from Wikipedia).

Due to these plate movements there are frequent deep earthquakes in the north and southwest, were subduction is occurring, and shallow earthquakes along the Alpine Fault. Although the Christchurch area (Canterbury region) had been stable for a long time, there are many faults underlying the area and a 1991 report by the government Earthquake Commission concluded that earthquakes as damaging as the February 22, 2011 event would occur on average every 55 years. The last major earthquake to affect the region was the 1922 Motunau earthquake.
On September 4, 2010 Christchurch was rocked by a magnitude 7.1 earthquake centred 38 km west of the city, at a depth of 10.5 km. While this quake caused a great deal of damage, no lives were lost, partly because it occurred at 4:35 am, when most people were at home, partly because New Zealandʼs strict building codes have resulted in relatively earthquake-resistant structures, and because the quake was relatively distant from the city and fairly deep. A magnitude 4.9 aftershock at 10:30 am on December 26 caused damage out of proportion to its size because it was shallow, at 5.12 km deep, and only 2.1 km from the city centre.
Earthquakes are categorized using the Richter Magnitude Scale in which each increase in magnitude means the ground is shaking ten times as hard. For instance, a magnitude 5.0 quake shakes ten times harder than a magnitude 4.0 tremor. How strong a quake feels at any particular location is dependent not only on the magnitude, but the distance from the epicentre (the surface location above the focus of the quake) and depth of the quake. Logically enough, a shallow nearby tremor is worse than a deeper more distant one of the same magnitude.
The magnitude 6.3 February 22 earthquake that we experienced was centred 6.8 kilometres from the city centre, at a depth of 5.9 km. The proximity of this quake, combined with the high intensity of the ground movement, contributed to its destructive force. Ground acceleration on February 22 was measured as high as 2.2 times the force of gravity (2.2g), compared to a high measured value of 1.26g on September 4. Furthermore, the ground motion was a combination of up and down and side to side shaking, making it almost impossible for buildings to survive. Also, many buildings had already been weakened by previous shocks and couldnʼt stand up to any more shaking. The timing of the quake contributed to the large number of deaths, since it occurred during lunch hour on a weekday, when many people were in the central business district.
Extensive damage was also caused by liquefaction. In this process, loose, saturated sediment loses all its strength and behaves like a liquid after it receives a shock. Large areas of the Christchurch are underlain by this type of sediment, which underwent liquefaction at the time of the September and February quakes, resulting in buildings being undermined, roads collapsing and damage to 80% of the water and sewage systems.
The cost of post earthquake reconstruction has been estimated at $12-billion. With about 376,000 people, Christchurch is New Zealandʼs second largest city and comprises about 8.6% of the countryʼs population. In terms of the proportion of the countryʼs population affected, the Christchurch earthquake is approximately analogous to a similar catastrophe hitting Toronto.
For Heather and I, and the two friends who took us in, the loss of the water infrastructure was the most immediate concern. Electricity had been restored where we were staying by 9:00 pm, but with no drinking
water and toilet facilities were a major concern. The four of us had a total of three litres of water, which wouldnʼt last long. Fortunately for us, it rained that night and we were able to collect a barrel of clear rainwater, which only had to be boiled before use. Toilet facilities were more of a challenge, with a hole in the ground or a bucket filling the bill. It was a lesson in how reliant we are on city utilities to keep us from regressing to a primitive lifestyle.
Christchurch continued to be rocked by aftershocks so, after three days, we left to stay with other friends in the town of Ashburton, about 90 km southwest of Christchurch. Ashburton was largely unaffected by the earthquakes and had full services and a welcome lack of aftershocks.
Because of the hasty departure from our apartment, most of our possessions were still there. Unfortunately, our place was inside the cordon maintained by the police and army for public safety and, therefore, was off limits for all but essential personnel. Daily calls to the police confirmed that no one was being allowed in.
By this point, ten days after the earthquake, we were eager to return to Canada so we wouldnʼt be a burden to our friends for longer than absolutely necessary. We had heard a rumor that some people were being allowed access to their homes in the cordoned-off area, so we decided to take a chance. On March 4 we showed up at one of the checkpoints with a phone bill to prove our address, and our passports for ID, and, much to our surprise, were allowed to go to our place unescorted to retrieve our belongings.
Inside the cordon the city was eerily quiet, with few vehicles and many roads damaged by the quake. Abandoned cars made the place feel like a ghost town.
We reached our building and found it apparently intact, and only slightly damaged but, half a block away, Colombo Street was a scene of devastation that looked like a war zone (Figures 4 and 5).
barely standing house; very damaged

Figure 4: The corner of Colombo and St. Asaph streets, half a block from our building.

broken buildings, cars, street
Our building had a yellow sticker, meaning it might have been unsafe to enter (kind of like saying this gun may be loaded), so we went in with some trepidation, concerned that an aftershock might bring it down. Inside (Figure 6), despite the fact that most things had fallen off the walls, or tipped over, and much of the kitchen ware had fallen out of the cupboards, the place seemed to be structurally intact, with some cracks in the walls being the only apparent damage.
We hurried to remove our belongings from the apartment and load them into our rented SUV, which ended up stuffed full to the roof. As we were finishing, a military vehicle with two soldiers stopped to see what we were doing. One soldier took a look at the yellow sticker on the building and told us to get out as quickly as possible.
Once we retrieved our things we were able to rebook our airline tickets, to depart two weeks earlier than planned. We then took a week-long trip to the north island, which had been planned before the earthquake. We returned to Christchurch briefly, then left for Canada on March 16.
broken glass inside of an apartment

Figure 6: Our apartment after the earthquake.

For Heather and I, our earthquake experience ended when the wheels of the Air New Zealand Boeing 777 left the ground in Auckland, bound for Vancouver. But, for the people of Christchurch, the ramifications of the disaster continue. Much of the downtown, called the Red Zone, is still cordoned off, meaning access is limited for both business and residents. No one can live or work in this area. Many buildings have red stickers, which means they are unsafe and may have to be demolished. Thousands of people are still either homeless, or living in badly-damaged houses that need to be rebuilt.
After returning to Canada, we were informed that our building had been red stickered and may have to be partially demolished, so the permanent residents, our friends, have had to find alternate accommodation for the foreseeable future. We feel fortunate to have come through the experience unscathed, and that none of our friends were harmed.