New paper: Strategic analysis of a water rights conflict in the south western United States

A new paper by PhD Candidate Simone Philpot has just been published in the Journal of Environmental Management!

Journal of Environmental Management cover.Simone, along with co-authors Dr. Keith Hipel and Dr. Peter Johnson, uses the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution to model the longstanding dispute over water allocation between Nevada and Utah. This modeling process allows for new insights into how different actors perform in different situations. Congrats to Simone for publishing her work in a very prestigious venue!

Abstract:

A strategic analysis of the ongoing conflict between Nevada and Utah, over groundwater allocation at Snake Valley, is carried out in order to investigate ways on how to resolve this dispute. More specifically, the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution is employed to formally model and analyze this conflict using the decision support system called GMCR+. The conflict analysis findings indicate that the dispute is enduring because of a lack of incentive and opportunity for any party to move beyond the present circumstances. Continued negotiations are not likely to resolve this conflict. A substantial change in the preferences or options of the disputants, or new governance tools will be required to move this conflict forward. This may hold lessons for future groundwater conflicts. It is, however, increasingly likely that the parties will require a third party intervention, such as equal apportionment by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Keywords:

  • Trans-boundary resource management
  • Groundwater
  • Water rights
  • Decision support system
  • Conflict analysis

Add new comment

Blog topics

  1. 2019 (3)
    1. May (1)
    2. April (2)
  2. 2018 (1)
    1. June (1)
  3. 2017 (5)
    1. September (1)
    2. August (1)
    3. June (1)
    4. May (1)
    5. March (1)
  4. 2016 (3)
    1. June (1)
    2. March (1)
    3. January (1)
  5. 2015 (6)
    1. October (1)
    2. July (1)
    3. April (2)
    4. March (1)
    5. February (1)
  6. 2014 (9)
    1. December (1)
    2. November (2)
    3. August (1)
    4. July (2)
    5. June (1)
    6. March (1)
    7. January (1)
  7. 2013 (2)
    1. July (1)
    2. April (1)
  8. 2012 (5)
    1. December (1)
    2. August (1)
    3. May (1)
    4. April (1)
    5. February (1)
  9. 2011 (6)
    1. December (1)
    2. November (1)
    3. May (1)
    4. March (1)
    5. January (2)
  10. 2010 (6)
    1. December (1)
    2. July (1)
    3. June (1)
    4. May (2)
    5. April (1)
  11. 2009 (2)
    1. June (1)
    2. February (1)
  12. 2008 (9)
    1. December (1)
    2. August (1)
    3. May (2)
    4. April (2)
    5. March (1)
    6. February (1)
    7. January (1)
  13. 2007 (1)