Hope y’all are having a great Heritage Week! With Canada/Ontario 150 this year, it’s the perfect time to celebrate achievements and take stock.
My local branch of Architectural Conservancy Ontario holds its annual Heritage Week celebration in Stratford tonight.
We’re using the occasion to mark an important milestone — the 200th application to our Historical Plaque Program.
Launched in 2011, the Historic Plaque Program is the marquee program of the Stratford/Perth County Branch. As of today, almost 210 plaque applications have been received, with about 35 in 2016.
The purpose of the program is to recognize and promote the architecture and history of older buildings in the city and county by providing owners with handsome and publicly visible plaques, while also raising funds for branch activities.
Plaques include the date the building was built, the name of the first owner or occupant, the occupation (and sometimes employer) of that person, and the name of the branch. The plaque is rather large in size (20” by 14”) and is made of plastic (yes, they hold up quite well). Plaques are mounted on the wall of the structure in a place clearly visible to the passerby.
A one-page report or monograph summarizing the research undertaken by members of our plaque committee, including a photograph of the building, accompanies the plaque. The report is also posted on the branch website.
The plaque application fee is $125, of which approx. $90 covers the cost of the plaque and the balance goes toward branch operations. The applicant receives a tax receipt for $30. Along with membership dues, the program is the chief source of branch funds.
So far almost all plaque applications are from Stratford and are for houses. On a few streets in particular the program has really caught on, with every second or third house sporting a plaque. Outside the city there are now three plaques in St. Marys and five in rural areas of the county.
It may not surprise you to know that a chief selling feature of our plaques is that they do not involve designation under the Ontario Heritage Act!
I’m also proud that this Heritage Week marks the second anniversary of this blog, OHA+M!
For those who have been with me from the start, you may recall that the second post to the blog, from February 27, 2015, was on the subject of stats: “Good heritage stats are hard to find!” [1]
Thinking it might be time for an update, I approached the good folks at the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Here’s the latest unofficial figures (thank you, Bert!):
- 125 Heritage Conservation Districts now in effect (up from 115 in ’15)
- 48 new HCDs (incorporating over 9,500 properties) have come into effect since the 2005 OHA amendments (up from 38)
- 5 new HCD designation by-laws appealed to the OMB and not yet in effect (compared to 9 in that position in ’15)
- Over 1,400 properties protected under Part IV of the OHA since the 2005 amendments (up from 1,200)
- Over 6,900 properties individually protected under Part IV from 1975 to the present (up from 6,700)
- Over 22,600 properties protected as part of an HCD under Part V from 1975 to the present (up from 19,100)
- 151 municipal heritage committees (down 1 from ’15)
With respect to municipal Heritage Property Tax Relief (HPTR) programs:
- 46 (41 lower/single tier and 5 upper tier) municipalities have now passed a by-law enabling them to provide HPTR (up from 42 in 2014)
- $5.184 million in HPTR was paid out province-wide in 2014, of which $3.01 million came from lower/single tier municipalities, $26,871 came from upper tier municipalities — and $2.146 million came from the province (up from a total of $4.48M and $1.86M from the province in 2013)
Trends?
Individual designation activity seems to have recovered with about 100 by-laws passed in each of the last two years, up from 78 in 2014. But still well down from the high point of 155 in 2008.
HCD activity continues very strong. And it appears that fewer new HCD designations are being appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, perhaps as a result of the Board’s recent track record. As MTCS’s Andrew Jeanes observed: “OMB decisions regarding HCDs have been quite consistent in finding that if the municipality followed the process appropriately (including recommendations in the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, as well as what’s specified in the OHA itself), then the appeals have no merit.”
HPTR continues in the right direction if lanquidly. The observations in the 2015 OHA+M article “Heritage Property Tax Relief — slow but steady?” continue to hold. [2]
Back to the local, I’m pleased to report that after a few years of study, and a hiccup or two, St. Marys is on the brink of creating an HPTR program. That will make 47!
Notes
Note 1: https://danschneiderheritage.blogspot.ca/2015/02/good-heritage-stats-are-hard-to-find.html
Note 2: https://danschneiderheritage.blogspot.ca/2015/03/heritage-property-tax-relief.html