Responsibility 1
Develop recommendations to increase mentorship/sponsorship opportunities for BIPOC staff/faculty/students.
Background
Mentorship programs are beneficial to institutions, as they provide knowledge, guidance, or advice to support professional development or career advancement. Mentors ideally have more experience, knowledge, and connections to transfer to less experienced individuals in their fields. Existing programs at the University, particularly in the Student Success Office and faculties are well structured and valuable to students and employees. However, these programs are not typically tailored to racialized persons. To the Taskforce’s knowledge, there is only one mentorship program in the University, offered through the Racial Advocacy for Inclusion, Solidarity and Equity (RAISE), that specifically targets Black, Indigenous, or other racialized employees or students.
Responsibility 2
Suggest mitigation strategies to address conflicting information on how to navigate the system, provide equitable opportunities and overcome barriers for staff and faculty career advancement.
Background
To dismantle systemic barriers in the workplace, it is important to uncover and address problems in policies, processes, and procedures. For this reason, Policy 18 (staff employment), Policy 76 (faculty appointments), and Policy 77 (faculty tenure and promotion) were examined – as these policies address training, professional development, career advancement, and performance management – and must be reviewed through an anti-racism and anti-oppression lens, and using equity, diversity, and inclusion principles.
Responsibility 3
Develop recommendations to address how funding in support of professional development and mentorship for BIPOC staff/faculty/students is allocated and implemented.
Background
The Working Group examined barriers and explored funding options for racialized individuals to access professional development and mentorship opportunities and for units (e.g., faculties) to develop and deliver these opportunities.
Internal consultations conducted by the Working Group revealed that access to professional development opportunities is highly dependent on departmental budgets and is also at the discretion of managers and supervisors. Furthermore, the amount of available funds for these opportunities and the process to access them are not always evident/transparent. These factors could lead to inequities and fewer professional development opportunities for racialized employees – limiting their career progression or advancement. The following recommendation is intended to address these issues.
Responsibility 4
Develop communication strategies that increase awareness and foster access to professional development and mentorship opportunities for BIPOC staff/faculty/students.
Background
The Working Group held meetings with various stakeholders across campus to identify the challenges with communicating professional/academic development and mentorship opportunities to racialized audiences. Based on the outcomes of these meetings, it was determined that campus units are sending communications on services and offerings, but these messages are not coordinated. It was also discovered that clarity and awareness on available programs and resources appear to be low with regards to these opportunities.
Recommendation
Please refer to Recommendation 8 under “Overall Themes – Communications”.
Responsibility 5
Develop recommended options for Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) for BIPOC communities.
Background
Employee Resources Groups (ERGs) are grassroots networks that are voluntary, employee-led, and foster a diverse and inclusive workplace aligned with an organization’s mission, values, goals, and objectives. They are typically self-organized and share common interests or experiences that are based on gender, race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, lifestyle, or other such factors.
ERGs provide support for personal or professional development and create safe spaces for employees to be their authentic selves. They are also avenues for advocacy within an organization, with allies sometimes being invited to join these groups to support their colleagues. ERGs are also beneficial for the development of future leaders, increased employee engagement, and expanded marketplace reach.
Although the Taskforce is presenting a recommendation to establish ERGs that are aimed at members of Black, Indigenous, and other racialized communities, this suggestion would also be beneficial for a broader rollout of ERGS.
6Today, there is little representation in some staff and faculty populations (e.g., Black and Indigenous employees), limiting the number of potential mentors that can support the academic/ professional development, career advancement, or system navigation of others who “look like them”. To address this issue, the Taskforce recommends the creation of a mechanism for mobilizing a vetted group of mentors, who are appropriately trained and supported to fill the current void, while the University works to hire more diverse employees.