Rethinking the Science of Ozone Loss and Global Warming
UW's Qing-Bin Lu isn't afraid to challenge accepted thinking on two of the biggest environmental issues facing our planet: ozone loss and global warming. In recent years, the physics and astronomy professor has developed some intriguing theories on the cause of these crises.
When it comes to ozone loss, Lu doesn't dispute the role of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). As these manmade substances break down in the Earth's stratosphere, they release ozone-depleting chlorine. The question is what causes CFC breakdown.
Most scientists put the blame on the sun's ultraviolet rays. However, the largest ozone holes have been observed in years when solar activity - and hence ultraviolet radiation - was weakest, while the smallest holes were observed when solar activity was strongest.
Lu believes the real culprit is cosmic rays. These energetically charged particles produce large numbers of electrons, which in turn can break down CFCs. Lu's experimental data show that polar ice particles can amplify this effect as much as 30,000 times. Meanwhile, the year-to-year variations in cosmic ray intensity closely match variations in ozone levels over the South Pole, providing intriguing support for his theory.
The UW researcher brings similar thinking to bear on global warming. Conventional climate science attributes rising temperatures to the carbon dioxide generated by burning fossil fuels. However, while carbon dioxide levels increased linearly between 1850 and 1950, the Earth's surface temperatures stayed relatively constant. Moreover, although carbon dioxide levels have continued to rise over the last 60 years, global temperatures have actually begun to drop since 2002.
But if carbon dioxide didn't cause global warming, what did? Lu's recent studies point to CFCs. Although these powerful greenhouse gases are found in much smaller concentrations in the Earth's atmosphere than carbon dioxide, Lu's models reveal a strong linear correlation between CFC levels and global temperatures. According to his re-analysis of temperature data, halocarbon levels and carbon dioxide levels, CFCs alone could account for the 0.5-0.6 °C increase in global temperatures that occurred between 1950 and 2000.
If this is indeed the case, it has significant implications. Thanks to the phase-out of CFC use that began in 1999, Lu says the current global cooling trend can be expected to continue for the next five to seven decades.
Researcher: Qing-Bin Lu
Partners: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.