Blog

Filters
RSS
RSS
Close X

Filter by:

Limit to posts where the date of the blog post:
Date range
Limit to posts where the date of the blog post:
Limit to posts where the title matches:
Limit to posts tagged with one or more of:
Limit to posts where the audience is one or more of:
Neglected Lambeth School building in degraded parking lot, London, Ontario
Monday, July 17, 2017

CRB finds old school doesn't pass the test

A recent decision by the Conservation Review Board helps elucidate one of the criteria for heritage designation.

In Lambeth Health Organization Inc. v. London (City), issued on March 1, 2017, the Board had to decide whether a 1925 former school building in the community of Lambeth, now part of the City of London, met the criteria for designation in O. Reg. 9/06. [1]
 

Canada 150 anniversary logo with maple leaf
Friday, June 30, 2017

At 150, looking back to 100

On the eve of the country’s and province’s 150th anniversary, a look back to two historic achievements associated with our last big national bash.

A stone statue of a woman in front of a stone building with the word "tribunal" in-scripted on it
Saturday, June 17, 2017

Changes to the OMB - meh

In case you missed it… on May 30, 2017 Minister of Municipal Affairs Bill Mauro introduced the government’s long-anticipated changes to the Ontario Municipal Board. Bill 139, the Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017, combines OMB/planning system-related changes and changes to the Conservation Authorities Act, which has also been under review. [1]

The province says: “If passed, the proposed legislation would overhaul the province’s land use planning appeal system.”

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Wish list changes to the OHA, part one ... or, bands in the OHA

It’s been over ten years now since the last major amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act in 2005-06.

I am sometimes asked what new changes should be made to the Act. Well, there are a few...

Let’s start with an easy one.

The OHA should be amended to remove the reference to “[Indian] bands” in the definition of municipality. This reference is outdated and unnecessary — not to mention culturally insensitive, or worse.

Specifically, section 2 of the OHA defines “municipality” as follows:

A hand holding a magnifying glass with the words "Bill C-323" in red placed in the center
Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Probing Bill C-323

The legislation we’ve been following, private member’s Bill C-323, is headed to committee!  But it’s uncertain when that will be. The Environment committee is still busy with a major review of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. The committee is off the last two weeks of April and only has five weeks in May and early June before rising for summer break.

So it may not happen until fall. In the meantime, we in the heritage community should be thinking hard about what to say to the committee — and who should say it — when they hold public hearings on the bill.

A building called "Fort Saskatchewan" with words supporting history preservation and Bill C-323
Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Bill C-323 clears a hurdle

The Speaker:

"I declare the motion carried. Accordingly, the bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development."

- Hansard, March 23, 2017

By a vote of 150 to 140, Bill C-323, which would create a tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic properties, passed Second Reading in the House of Commons last Thursday.[1] Wow!

A black and white doodle of the parliament building in Ottawa, Ontario
Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Debating Bill C-323

"Most of those who have grown to know and love our country's history have travelled that path guided by heritage buildings that were the gateways to the stories of the past."

- Peter Van Loan, MP (CPC)

The most interesting heritage discussion in Canada right now is going on in Ottawa — in the House of Commons!