Rails and trails
The blog marks another milestone with this post. Welcome to OHA+M, edition 80!
The blog marks another milestone with this post. Welcome to OHA+M, edition 80!
I’m very happy to have a guest contributor to the CHLs discussion. Welcome Henry Cary!
Henry, a cultural heritage specialist and archaeologist with Golder Associates, takes a detailed look at the official guidance materials on cultural heritage landscapes in Ontario over the years and poses some hard questions about the application of current approaches to rural landscapes.
The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 says:
2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.
Last time we looked at the evolution of the definition of cultural heritage landscapes, now in its third iteration. We did not look at the meaning of “significant.”
Earlier this year I was asked to name some of the key changes, actions or themes affecting heritage conservation in Ontario over the last generation or so.
We saw last time that the Conservation Review Board is one busy little tribunal these days. The website list of their active cases doesn’t reveal what kind of cases they are but I’d bet dollars to doughnuts they all have to do with objections to designation.
We all love statistics, especially when they’re moving in the right direction.
Picking up from last time:
The City of Toronto and the province are joining forces to address the tax squeeze in which a number of Toronto properties find themselves.
You’ve surely heard of 401 Richmond? The building at 401 Richmond Street West at the corner of Spadina Avenue in downtown Toronto has been making news for a while now — and not in a good way.
In “The Blog Takes a Bow” late last year I signaled that OHA+M would be relocating to the website of UWaterloo’s Heritage Resources Centre. Well, c’est arrivé!
As for 2018, here are some things to watch for.
The Trudeau government’s reaction to the ENVI report