Bill 23 and the ERO
Bill 23 and the ERO
Bill 23 and the ERO
Bill 23: This Game of Chicken Will Have a Bad Ending [1]
Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022, takes a sledgehammer to key parts of the Ontario Heritage Act and Ontario’s cultural heritage protection system.1
One of the more insidious proposals — not getting nearly enough attention in the slew of outrageous changes — takes aim at how we define cultural heritage itself.
It’s almost Orwellian.
Juggling Heritage and Accessibility
As part of a farewell tribute to the Conservation Review Board — now swallowed whole by the Ontario Land Tribunal — we’re digging into some of the Review Board’s recent decisions in so-called legacy cases. (Note that most if not all of these have been authored by a single CRB, now OLT, member, Daniel Nelson.)1
attribute ~
something attributed as belonging to a person, thing, group, etc.; a quality, character, characteristic, or property
element ~
The clock has run down on Ontario’s Conservation Review Board, a fixture for 46 years of our heritage protection regime. Along with the Ontario Heritage Trust, the CRB was one of our two cultural heritage-focused provincial agencies.
We should be sorry to see it go.
Happy Heritage Week!
In 2019 the province passed Bill 108 (the More Homes, More Choices Act), a developer-friendly grab-bag of changes including amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.1
We are coming late to grasping the grave threat that climate change poses to our economy, our society and our safety.
What Ever Happened to Building Stories?