OHA+M is an award-winning blog about the Ontario Heritage Act, heritage policy in Ontario and related topics. New posts monthly. Comments on posts and suggestions for new posts are most welcome! All posts copyright © 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 Dan Schneider. To subscribe to OHA+M, on the menu to the left, click on "Subscribe to OHA+M" under "Blog".
Stone milkhouse, Westerveld Farm, Caledon
Still on the topic of cultural heritage landscapes (bear with me, just a couple more rounds to go!): We have yet to look at how CHL arguments have fared before the Ontario Municipal Board, now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.
For the 85th edition of OHA+M: We return to our recent farms theme and look at another way to protect historic farmsteads. I’m very happy to have a guest contributor to the discussion, landowner Barbara Heidenreich.
I have been putting off writing about Bill 66, the proposed Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act.[1]
As OHA+M is a blog on heritage policy, it seemed impossible to ignore a major legislative foray by the new provincial government that could have major implications for Ontario’s cultural heritage protection regime and the resources it is designed to protect. The bill was introduced last December 6, the final day of the fall session.
Marcolongo Farm, Guelph: View of the bank barn from across the grassy meadow
Photo courtesy Mike Marcolongo
So how do you (successfully) designate a farm?
Farm scene near Bamberg, Ontario
Let’s continue our look at the protection of farms using heritage designation under Part IV of the OHA.
Illustration from Perth County Historical Atlas, 1879
Lights on the Sarnia Bridge reflected in the Thames River
The blog marks another milestone with this post. Welcome to OHA+M, edition 80!
I’m very happy to have a guest contributor to the CHLs discussion. Welcome Henry Cary!
Henry, a cultural heritage specialist and archaeologist with Golder Associates, takes a detailed look at the official guidance materials on cultural heritage landscapes in Ontario over the years and poses some hard questions about the application of current approaches to rural landscapes.
The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 says:
2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved.
Last time we looked at the evolution of the definition of cultural heritage landscapes, now in its third iteration. We did not look at the meaning of “significant.”
Main Street, Warkworth, Ontario
Earlier this year I was asked to name some of the key changes, actions or themes affecting heritage conservation in Ontario over the last generation or so.
