Records of quality reviews of the University's undergraduate programs.
Related Records | Responsible Unit | Information Steward | Information Confidentiality Classification | Retention | Disposition | Authority | Retention Rationale | Version Information
Content & Scope
Academic program reviews are carried out under the University’s Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP). Undergraduate program reviews are typically conducted on a 7 year cycle. Some undergraduate and graduate programs may be reviewed together (augmented reviews).
The records include self-study reports, review team reports, responses, chairs/directors' and Deans' reports outlining future strategies, and related correspondence.
Related Records
- See also GV30 – Senate and GV40 – Senate Committees & Councils for the Associate Vice-President Academic's summary reports on undergraduate program reviews, presented for discussion to Senate Undergraduate Council and then to Senate for information.
- For records of quality reviews of the University's graduate programs, see TL15 – Graduate Program Review.
Responsible Unit
- Associate Vice-President Academic.
- Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Affairs, for some augmented reviews.
Information Steward
- Associate Vice-President, Academic.
Information Confidentiality Classification
- Public: reports intended for public release.
- Confidential: all other records.
Retention
Until the next review cycle is complete.
Disposition
Archives.
Authority
- Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance Framework.
- University of Waterloo. Institutional Quality Assurance Process (IQAP).
Retention Rationale
The retention period is based on operational use. These records have long term historical value.
Approval Date
26 July 2010