Monday, May 4, 2015 12:30 pm
-
12:30 pm
EDT (GMT -04:00)
Of
the
thesis
entitled: [Un]canny
Spaces:
The
Unbecoming
of
Everyday Architecture
Abstract:
Beginning
in
the
late eighteenth
century,
socioeconomic
changes
due
to
rapid
urbanization
defined
a clear
demarcation
between
public
and
private
realms.
In
opposition
to
the chaotic
milieu
of
the
cities,
the
notion
of
home
as
a
site
of
refuge was
even more
reinforced,
propagating
a
cult
of
domesticity
in
the
bourgeois
society. Displaying
excessive
interior
decorations
and
countless
collections
of
personal objects,
home
has
become
an
inwardly-constructed
embodiment
of
one’s desires, memories
and
emotions.
Not
only
a
hideout
from
the
external
world
but
also
an exposé
of
one’s
repressed
unconscious,
home
becomes
simultaneously
a
place
of the
homely
and
the
unhomely.
The thesis investigates the phenomenology of the ambivalent nature of everyday architecture. Within banal landscape of familiar world, the unhomely emerges and subverts the preconceived notion of architectural space. What was once inextricably linked to one’s senses is now being questioned of its validity and reliability. The unhomely is not a physical setting located in a particular site, nor a mere stimulus eliciting certain emotions; rather, it is the process of re-contextualization of one’s intimate relationship with the world. This architectural phenomenon reveals the notion of death living in our existential temporality through the process in which the unconscious is projected onto the physical materiality of architecture. It is the fearful nature of everyday space which unbecomes itself, separating our bodily ego from the world of familiarity.
The following work attempts to analyze the nature the un- of the [un]homely. This mechanism indicates that our everyday space is imbued with a precarious, yet, powerful energy of becoming that constantly transforms the familiar into the unfamiliar. In the space of the unhomely, we are haunted by our own emotions and imaginations which create a new kind of architectural experience beyond the domain of the corporeal.
The thesis investigates the phenomenology of the ambivalent nature of everyday architecture. Within banal landscape of familiar world, the unhomely emerges and subverts the preconceived notion of architectural space. What was once inextricably linked to one’s senses is now being questioned of its validity and reliability. The unhomely is not a physical setting located in a particular site, nor a mere stimulus eliciting certain emotions; rather, it is the process of re-contextualization of one’s intimate relationship with the world. This architectural phenomenon reveals the notion of death living in our existential temporality through the process in which the unconscious is projected onto the physical materiality of architecture. It is the fearful nature of everyday space which unbecomes itself, separating our bodily ego from the world of familiarity.
The following work attempts to analyze the nature the un- of the [un]homely. This mechanism indicates that our everyday space is imbued with a precarious, yet, powerful energy of becoming that constantly transforms the familiar into the unfamiliar. In the space of the unhomely, we are haunted by our own emotions and imaginations which create a new kind of architectural experience beyond the domain of the corporeal.
The examining committee is as follows:
Supervisor:
Committee Members:
Ryszard Sliwka, University of Waterloo
Adrian Blackwell,University
of
Waterloo
Andrew
Levitt,
University
of Waterloo
External Reader:
Scott Sorli
The
committee
has
been
approved
as
authorized
by
the
Graduate
Studies
Committee.
The
Defence
Examination
will
take
place:
Monday
May
4,
2015
12:30PM
Architecture
Room 2003
(Photo
Studio)
A
copy
of
the
thesis
is
available
for
perusal
in
ARC
2106A.