Friday, April 17, 2015 1:00 pm
-
1:00 pm
EDT (GMT -04:00)
Of
the
thesis
entitled: PART TEN
: A
Case
for
Increased
Regulation
of Relocatable
Buildings
in
the
Province
of
Ontario
Abstract:
This
thesis
addresses
the
role
that
building
regulations and
codes
have
in
shaping
the
way
in
which
the
pre-fabricated
building
industry designs,
manufactures
and
installs
Relocatable
Buildings
(RB)
used
within
the Institutional,
Commercial
and
Industrial (ICI)
sectors. It
looks
at
the
history
and
development
of the
Relocatable
Building
industry
with
particular
focus
on
their
application and
use
in
the
Province
of
Ontario,
within
the
larger
North
American context. Familiar
typologies
under
the umbrella
of
relocatable
buildings include:
Manufactured
Homes,
Emergency Shelters,
Portable
Classrooms
and
Industrial
Accommodations[1]. Of
these
categories
of
relocatable
buildings, the
latter
two
will
be
the
focus
addressed
within
this
work
The majority of relocatable buildings are manufactured and constructed without the direct involvement of the architectural profession. Many of these buildings barely meet basic requirements of health, safety, durability, and occupant comfort that is expected of contemporary construction for all other occupied building typologies[2]. This problematic building type needs to garner greater attention from designers, regulators and building officials in order to set in place the framework for clearer regulatory guidelines and requirements for these structures. Such a framework has the potential to lead to overall improvement of the quality of construction and product delivery within this sector.
This thesis illustrates proposed modifications of the primary documents which set the current regulatory framework for these buildings in Canada: the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Z240 Standard for Manufactured Homes[3]; the CSA A277 Standards for Factory Built Buildings; the Ontario Building Code (OBC) 2012 edition[4]; and the National Building and model voluntary standards, intend to increase and improve the baseline expectations and requirements of building construction in this category with the intent of directly improving the quality of end product being generated by this billion dollar annual Canadian industry. The resultant goal being that design and construction improvements based on changes in regulation, extend to benefit the lives, and day-to-day experiences, of users and occupants of these relocatable structures. This thesis examines the potential, details and positive outcomes for revising the OBC to reflect the addition of this new chapter to the code.
The majority of relocatable buildings are manufactured and constructed without the direct involvement of the architectural profession. Many of these buildings barely meet basic requirements of health, safety, durability, and occupant comfort that is expected of contemporary construction for all other occupied building typologies[2]. This problematic building type needs to garner greater attention from designers, regulators and building officials in order to set in place the framework for clearer regulatory guidelines and requirements for these structures. Such a framework has the potential to lead to overall improvement of the quality of construction and product delivery within this sector.
This thesis illustrates proposed modifications of the primary documents which set the current regulatory framework for these buildings in Canada: the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Z240 Standard for Manufactured Homes[3]; the CSA A277 Standards for Factory Built Buildings; the Ontario Building Code (OBC) 2012 edition[4]; and the National Building and model voluntary standards, intend to increase and improve the baseline expectations and requirements of building construction in this category with the intent of directly improving the quality of end product being generated by this billion dollar annual Canadian industry. The resultant goal being that design and construction improvements based on changes in regulation, extend to benefit the lives, and day-to-day experiences, of users and occupants of these relocatable structures. This thesis examines the potential, details and positive outcomes for revising the OBC to reflect the addition of this new chapter to the code.
The examining committee is as follows:
Supervisor:
Committee Members:
Terri Meyer Boake, University of Waterloo
Lloyd
Hunt,University
of
Waterloo
David
Lieberman,
University of
Toronto
External Reader:
Paul Dowsett, Architect, Sustainable TO
The
committee
has
been
approved
as
authorized
by
the
Graduate
Studies
Committee.
The
Defence
Examination
will
take
place:
Friday
April
17,
2015
1:00PM
Architecture
Room 2026
A
copy
of
the
thesis
is
available
for
perusal
in
ARC
2106A.