Institute for Quantum Computing (IQC) main building, Quantum Nano Centre (QNC) at the University of Waterloo
Wednesday, September 23, 2026 - Friday, September 25, 2026 (all day)

ML4QT Symposium | Machine Learning to Advance Quantum Technologies

Fostering exchange and collaboration among experts from academia, research institutions, and industry. 

The Machine Learning to Advance Quantum Technologies (ML4QT) Symposium serves as a leading forum for researchers and developers interested in the convergence of machine learning and quantum innovation. Whether you are actively working in this space or seeking to get involved, ML4QT provides an ideal environment to discover new opportunities, foster collaboration, and help drive the next generation of quantum technologies.

This second annual gathering will be held at the Institute for Quantum Computing, within the Quantum-Nano Centre, University of Waterloo from the 23 to 25 of September 2026

Important Dates

  • July 1, 2026|Call for Contribution Submission Deadline 
  • July 1, 2026 | General Registration Opens 
  • August 1, 2026 | Contribution Decision Notifications 
  • September 1, 2026 | Registration Closes
  • September 23 - 25 | ML4QT Symposium 

Have questions about the event? Contact us at iqc.events@uwaterloo.ca

Invited Speakers

Barry Sanders, University of Calgary

Barry Sanders headshot

Artificial Intelligence for Representing and Characterizing Quantum Systems

I review how integrating AI into quantum-system characterisation is typically based on machine learning, deep learning and language models for the core tasks of quantum-property prediction and quantum-system reconstruction with applications to certification, benchmarking, enhancing quantum information processing and identifying critical quantum phenomena. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04923

Connor van Rossum, University of Queensland

Headshot of Connor van Rossum

Can noise help quantum algorithms? Insights from sampling and variational methods

Quantum algorithms typically claim to be resource efficient relative to classical algorithms but it is well known that this performance differential may vanish under realistic operating conditions or noise. While the field has developed strategies to retain quantum advantage, the interaction between quantum and classical resources is often ignored but critically determines the efficacy of quantum algorithms. Our first result, in the context of noisy quantum variational learning, shows that performance depends on how noise interacts with classical optimisation. I show that commonly used subroutines in error‑mitigation strategies such as Pauli twirling can degrade variational optimisation by suppressing gradients and reducing expressivity. In contrast, biased or non‑unital noise can introduce exploitable structure that improves optimisation outcomes. Through analytical and numerical studies, this work demonstrates that preserving noise asymmetries can lead to better performance than symmetrising noise, challenging standard assumptions about mitigation in the variational setting. In recent times, quantum variational models have evolved towards sample-based quantum algorithms for chemistry. For the specific example of Sample‑based Quantum Diagonalisation (SQD), in our second result, I show that noise enables a higher unique sampling rate that allow classical stochastic algorithms to outperform quantum algorithms for naively designed chemistry demonstrations. I discuss that standard error mitigation is not useful for these algorithms, before showing how machine learning can enable better ansatze design and measurement techniques to not only increase the unique sampling rate but ensure noise-robustness and resource efficiency of these demonstrations.  

Manas Mukherjee, National University of Singapore

Manas Mukherjee Headshot

Seeking advantage in Quantum-Classical Machine Learning with trapped ion system

Quantum technologies, specifically Quantum Computing (QC), represent a paradigm shift in computational power. However, the roadmap to utility is hindered by the inherent fragility of quantum states—a hurdle that makes scaling the industry’s greatest challenge.

To address this, we have developed a quantum-classical hybrid framework designed to push the boundaries of Quantum Machine Learning (QML). By leveraging the trapped-ion platform—noted for its superior coherence times and high gate fidelities—we have demonstrated that quantum classifiers can achieve over 98% fidelity in supervised learning tasks using real-world datasets [1, 2].

While achieving parity with classical systems is a significant milestone, our current research pivots toward the ultimate goal: identifying the specific parameters and architectures where QML provides a definitive advantage over classical counterparts. Here, we will discuss detail of our findings across varied application contexts, highlighting the conditions under which quantum enhancement becomes a reality.

[1] 10.1103/physreva.106.012411

[2] 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113058

Shayan Majidy, Harvard University

Shayan Majidy Headshot

Topic TBC

Yuval Baum, Q-CTRL

Yuval Baum Headshot

Topic TBC

Christine Muschik, University of Waterloo

Topic TBC

Lirandë Pira, National University of Singapore

Topic TBC

Nathan Wiebe, University of Toronto

Topic TBC

ML4QT Organizing Committee

Achim Kempf

Achim Kempf headshot

Christian Tutschku

Christian Tutschku headshot

Christine Muschik

Christine Muschik headshot

Lirandë Pira

Lirande Headshot

Virginia Frey

Virginia Frey headshot

Marco Roth

Headshot of Dr. Marco Roth