CRC position management

General Management

Relevant University policies

Waterloo’s commitment to the principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion can be found throughout its library of University policies. Those policies relevant to the recruitment and management of CRCs include:

Back to top

Internal review committee

The Office of Research is responsible for general oversight of the CRC Program at the University of Waterloo. The Internal CRC Review Committee provides additional oversight in respect of both new and renewal nominations and use of the corridor of flexibility.

Back to top

Allocation of chair positions

CRC allocations will be informed by equity considerations as well as Tri-agency funding. Decisions will be guided by the strategic priorities of the University, with oversight by the Vice-President, Research & International, Provost and President.

The process for allocating chair positions is as follows:

  1. Any increase to a Faculty’s Chair allocation will take effect immediately.
  2. Any decrease to a Faculty’s Chair allocation will be implemented as follows:
    • If that Faculty has an open Chair position, it will be withdrawn and either re-allocated to another Faculty in accordance with internal procedures or, if the Institution as a whole must lose a Chair position, returned to the CRCP.
    • If that Faculty does not have an open Chair position, the OR will review allocations across the Institution to determine if there is an open Chair position elsewhere that could be returned to the CRCP to avoid having to wind-down a filled Chair. Inter-Faculty negotiations facilitated by the OR will ensure the Chair position is returned as soon as possible.
    • If there is no flexibility across the University, the Faculty losing a Chair position will be required to initiate a wind-down of an existing Chair. To wind-down a Chair(s), that Faculty will work with the OR to do so with minimal disruption to the Chairholder.
      • i.e. The Dean and Provost will ensure that the level of support (financial and non-financial) agreed at the outset continues until what would have been the normal end of the CRC term. In keeping with the CRC Program’s guidelines, the Chairholders will also retain their title until what would have been the end of their term.
    • To ensure a fair and transparent process for returning a filled Chair position, the first call for a phase-out will be a second-term Chairholder closest to the end of his/her second term or, if there is no second-term Chairholder, the Chairholder closest to the end of his/her first term, regardless of Tier.

Back to top

Requesting or reversing flex moves

Faculties should follow the process below to request or reverse a flex move.

  1. Prior to requesting a flex move and advertising a CRC position, apply an equity lens to ensure that members of the FDG would not be disadvantaged.
  2. Contact the Office of Research to request a change from your current allocation prior to advertising a CRC position.
  3. The Internal CRC Review Committee will review the request including consideration of the impact to the FDG.
  4. The Office of Research will forward the request to the Tri-Agency Institutional Programs Secretariat for approval.
  5. You will be notified of the final decision and the Office of Research will update the public accountability website.
  6. Once you receive final approval, you can advertise the Chair position.
  7. Remember to revert back to the initial allocation as soon as possible.

Back to top

Recruitment

CRC concurrent external/internal selection process

Please note: To ensure a fair, open, and transparent process, the University of Waterloo does not allow 3rd term nominations and eliminated the option of using the emergency retention pathway effective January 1, 2018.

Please note: Faculties may choose to target job advertisements to any of the Four Designated Groups (FDG). View the recommendations for equity wording in job advertisements. Vacant CRC positions may be advertised internally, or advertised concurrently internally and externally. 

The selection committee must follow the steps below to ensure compliance with new CRC requirements for a position being advertised concurrently externally and internally. If you have any questions, contact the Office of Research CRC manager.

Selection Committee

  1. When a CRC allocation has been approved, contact the Office of Research CRC manager to obtain information about Waterloo’s internal arrangements (financial and non-financial) for CRCs and a copy of the CRC Selection Committee Cover Memo
    1. Use the Cover Memo to select and nominate a CRC.
    2. Attach the completed Cover Memo to the front of the Internal Nomination Form package (also see step nine).
  2. Establish a selection committee and follow all relevant University/Faculty/Departmental policies/guidelines (e.g. Policy 65, Policy 69) and CRC selection practices/policies to select new CRC nominees. The committee must:
    1. have more than one member,
    2. include one or more individuals from the FDG or have made concrete efforts to form a diverse committee, and
    3. include an equity champion. While equity is everyone’s responsibility, the champion will ensure that equity and diversity are considered throughout the selection process.
  3. Contact Joseph Pazzano, Human Rights, Equity and Inclusion Office, to ensure all individuals involved in the selection process have undertaken equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) training within the last 12 months. If not, training must be completed before committee work is initiated.
  4. Once EDI training is complete, decide the strategic area that will be filled by the chair position and the evaluation criteria that will be used to identify a nominee.
    1. Waterloo’s equity targets and gaps must be taken into account when deciding which field to support with a Chair and whether to limit the pool to internal candidates.

Advertisements/Search for Applicants

*The time from advertisement to application submission must be less than two years.

  1. Use the CAUT Authorization to Advertise for Tier 1 / Tier 2 CRC to create your ad.
    • Send drafts of your advertisement to the Office of Research CRC manager for review.
    • Use inclusive, unbiased, and ungendered language focused only on the qualifications and skills necessary to do the job.
    • Advertising as widely as possible and targeting FDG (beyond minimum requirements) to obtain a diverse group of applicants is strongly encouraged.
    • Emailing the advertisement to faculty members in the Department/Faculty to make them aware of the posting is also strongly encouraged.
    • The ad must provide a minimum of 30 days for applications to be submitted.
  2. Once the Office of Research has approved the advertisement, distribute your advertisement as determined in step five.
  3. Provide names and email addresses of all applicants for the position to the Equity Office, indicating those applicants selected for an interview. Applicants will be asked to complete an Equity Survey to assess effectiveness of outreach strategies and to determine the diversity of the pool. Aggregate data will be shared with the selection committee within three weeks in order to refine outreach practices in future searches.

Evaluation/Nomination Decision

  1. Evaluate the applicants using the evaluation criteria developed in step four. For nominees outside of Canada, consult the CRC Guidelines on Foreign Nominations. The committee must:
    • fairly consider the impact of leaves on a potential candidate’s record when assessing research outputs,
    • consider that leaves can contribute to a career slowdown as individual’s transition to being on leave and back to work;
    • ensure that the assessment process does not undervalue scholarship or research that is non-traditional or unconventional, based on Indigenous ways of knowing, outside the mainstream of the discipline, or focused on issues of gender, race, or minority status,
    • ensure that the need for workplace accommodations does not negatively impact a candidate’s assessment,
    • carefully document all evaluation processes and decisions at each stage of the process, and retain this information for a minimum of 48 months, and
    • review the final hiring decision (and challenge it if necessary) to ensure that unconscious bias did not negatively impact the decision-making process and that it is aligned with Waterloo’s EDI Action Plan.
  2.  Once the potential CRC nominee has been selected in compliance with the procedures above, let the CRC Manager (crc@uwaterloo.ca) in the Office of Research know who has been selected. The CRC Manager will reach out to the nominee and provide detailed instructions on how to complete the required Internal Nomination form (INF), as the next step in the CRC nomination process.

    Once the INF has been completed and signed, the nominee should send the original Internal Nomination Form package, including all attachments (electronic to crc@uwaterloo.ca and paper copy) to the CRC Manager (third floor, EC5). Ensure to include the completed and signed CRC Selection Committee Cover Memo.

  3. Once CRC requirements have been met, the Office of Research will forward the Internal Nomination Form package to a CRC Internal Review Committee for approval based on an assessment of:
    • alignment with Waterloo’s strategic priorities, including EDI, and
    • the strength of the nomination package.
  4. Office of Research staff will work with approved nominees to ensure applications are completed to meet CRC application deadlines.

CRC internal only selection process

Please note: Faculties may choose to target job advertisements to any of the Four Designated Groups (FDG). Vacant CRC positions may be advertised internally, or advertised concurrently internally and externally. The specific steps for advertising internally are as follows:

Selection Committee

  1. When a CRC allocation has been approved, contact the Office of Research CRC manager to obtain information about Waterloo’s internal arrangements (financial and non-financial) for CRCs and a copy of the CRC Selection Committee Cover Memo.
    • Use the Cover Memo to select and nominate a CRC.
    • Attach the completed Cover Memo to the front of the Internal Nomination Form package (also see step nine).
  2. Establish a selection committee and follow all relevant University/Faculty/Departmental policies/guidelines (e.g. Policy 65, Policy 69) and CRC selection practices/policies to select new CRC nominees. The committee must:
    • have more than one member,
    • include one or more individuals from the FDG or have made concrete efforts to form a diverse committee, and
    • include an equity champion. While equity is everyone’s responsibility, the champion will ensure that equity and diversity are considered throughout the selection process.
  3. Contact Joseph Pazzano, Human Rights, Equity and Inclusion Office, to ensure all individuals involved in the selection process have undertaken equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) training within the last 12 months. If not, training must be completed before committee work is initiated.
  4. Once EDI training is complete, decide the strategic area that will be filled by the chair position and the evaluation criteria that will be used to identify a nominee.
    • Waterloo’s equity targets and gaps must be taken into account when deciding which field to support with a Chair and whether to limit the pool to internal candidates.

Advertisements/Search for Applicants

*The time from advertisement to application submission must be less than two years.

  1. Two documents are required to advertise internally, which must be completed concurrently. Send drafts of the following two documents to the Office of Research CRC manager for review:
    • An internal advertisement by email to faculty members. Use the CAUT Authorization to Advertise for Tier 1 / Tier 2 CRC to create your internal ad.
      • Use inclusive, unbiased, and ungendered language focused only on the qualifications and skills necessary to do the job.
      • It is up to the Selection Committee to determine how broadly to distribute the internal ad, but it must be distributed at a minimum to: the entire Department/Institute/Centre/School or Faculty.
      • The internal ad must provide a minimum of 30 days for applications to be submitted.
    • A transparency statement to be posted on Waterloo’s CRC Public Accountability website.
  2. Once the Office of Research has approved both documents and the transparency statement has been posted on the UW CRC Public Accountability website, distribute your internal ad as determined in step five.
    • The transparency statement must be posted to the Public Accountability website on the same day the internal ad is sent to faculty members and will remain posted until the closing date indicated in the internal ad.
  3. Provide names and email addresses of all applicants for the position to the Equity Office, indicating those applicants selected for an interview. Applicants will be asked to complete an Equity Survey to assess effectiveness of outreach strategies and to determine the diversity of the pool. Aggregate data will be shared with the selection committee to refine outreach practices in future searches.

Evaluation/Nomination Decision

  1. Evaluate the applicants using the evaluation criteria developed in step four. For nominees from outside Canada, consult the CRC Guidelines on Foreign Nominations. The committee must:
    • fairly consider the impact of leaves on a potential candidate’s record when assessing research outputs,
    • consider that leaves can contribute to a career slowdown as individual’s transition to being on leave and back to work,
    • ensure that the assessment process does not undervalue scholarship or research that is non-traditional or unconventional, based on Indigenous ways of knowing, outside the mainstream of the discipline, or focused on issues of gender, race, or minority status,
    • ensure that the need for workplace accommodations does not negatively impact a candidate’s assessment,
    • carefully document all evaluation processes and decisions at each stage of the process, and retain this information for a minimum of 48 months, and
    • review the final hiring decision (and challenge it if necessary) to ensure that unconscious bias did not negatively impact the decision-making process and that it is aligned with Waterloo’s EDI Action Plan.
  2. Once a CRC nominee has been selected in compliance with the procedures above, complete the Internal Nomination Form package (including all attachments) and forward the original to the Office of Research CRC manager. Include the completed CRC Selection Committee Cover Memo.
  3. Once CRC requirements have been met, the Office of Research will forward the Internal Nomination Form package to a CRC Internal Review Committee, for approval based on an assessment of:
    • alignment with Waterloo’s strategic priorities, including EDI, and
    • the strength of the nomination package.
  4. Office of Research staff will work with approved nominees to ensure applications are completed to meet CRC application deadlines.

Renewals

Intellectual property

2024-2025

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs
  • Enhance institutions ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP\commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses and startups 
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programing

2023-2024

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs
  • Enhance institutions ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP\commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses and startups 
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programing

Actual

  • 38 Disclosures, 54 patents filed, 17 agreements executed, 9 startup companies supported
  • 16 presentations delivered to 475 campus participants

2022-2023

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity  to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs
  • Enhance institutions ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP\Commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses and startups
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programing

Actual

  • FTE:  8 staff
    New projects initiated = 28
    Patents filed = 39 
    New licenses = 6
    Startups in period = 5
  • IP education presentations =  25
    Participants = 515 people

2021-2022

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institution's ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP\Commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and start-ups
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programing 

Actual

  • 15 Projects initiated (6 pending assessment); 36 patents filed; 3 licenses; 6 startups
  • 22 presentations delivered to 329 participants

2020-2021

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institution's ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP\Commericialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and start-ups
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programing 

Actual

  • 18 projects initiated, 33 patents filed, 4 licenses, 13 startups
  • 29 info session presentations to 547 campus participants

2019-2020

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institution's ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP/Commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and start-ups
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programming

Actual

  • 11 Projects initiated, 10 Patents filed, 4 Licenses executed, 3 Start ups
  • 28 campus IP presentations\lectures delivered with an increase in participation to approximately 1100 attendees (approx. 30% increase from the 838 participants in 2018-19). 

2018-2019

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institution's ability to support IP awareness raising to campus community
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Number of IP/Commercialization presentations and workshops developed and delivered
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and start-ups
  • Number of campus participants receiving educational programming

Actual

  • 9 new projects, 25 Patents filed, 6 Licenses executed, 7 Start ups
  • 28 campus IP presentations\lectures to 838 participants.   Outreach to campus audiences not traditionally engaged in IP commercialization occurred, such as AHS, Environment and Arts (History).  Activity also included an IP seminar series for CBB comprised of 5 different sessions covering different IP topics.

2017-2018

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institutions ability to measure the economic impact of research outcomes
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Implement a faculty commercialization disclosure reporting system
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and startups
  • Increase number of faculty IP disclosures

Actual

  • 13 new projects initiated, 22 new patents filed,  9 licenses, 3 startups created
  • 24 new WatCo disclosures, 90 new IP policy disclosures

2016-2017

Institutional performance objective
  • Sustain capacity to provide IP management and commercialization services related to research outputs 
  • Enhance institutions ability to measure the economic impact of research outcomes
Indicator
  • Number of staff (FTEs or equivalent) devoted to the transfer of technology
  • Implement a faculty commercialization disclosure reporting system
Outcomes

Target

  • Number of projects initiated, patents filed, licenses, and start-ups
  • Increase number of faculty IP disclosures

Actual

  • 14 projects initiated, 21 patents filed, 6 licenses, 4 startups
  • 32 WatCo disclosures; 140 disclosure campus wide disclosures Policy 73

Criteria

Excellence comes in many forms, and the metrics discussed below are by no means exhaustive. Though these metrics have always been taken into account, they have now been made explicit in this transparent framework.

Committee members should give careful consideration to, and be sensitive to the impact of, individual circumstances when assessing a nominee’s research productivity. This can include, but is not limited to, the following examples: career interruptions or slow-downs (e.g. maternity, parental, or sick leaves, pregnancy, eldercare, etc.), publication delays (e.g. to protect intellectual property), research in an emerging field or interdisciplinary research, and intellectual leadership activities. Waterloo’s Equity Office will provide training to those involved in developing CRC renewal criteria and to members of Faculty Evaluation Committees reviewing renewal requests. For more information, please see the CRC Program Guidelines for Assessing Productivity of Nominees.

In order to be nominated for renewal, CRCs must have met all the criteria of the ‘renewal plan’ established at the start of their initial term, while accounting for any individual circumstances outlined above. They must also have demonstrated an ability to establish an outstanding, world-class research program that builds on the accomplishments of the initial term (Tier 1), or have made progress toward becoming an outstanding researcher of world-class caliber (Tier 2).

All CRCs will be academics of stellar reputation, demonstrating academic and research leadership appropriate to their discipline and Tier. Leadership can take many forms, including but not limited to, participating in university committees or other strategic endeavours that positively impact a broad audience. It can also include creating research centres/institutes; outreach to stakeholder groups; advocating for policy improvements; leading multi-PI grants; writing books or manuals; communicating research results internally and externally; and providing mentorship to junior faculty and/or graduate students. CRCs are also expected to demonstrate leadership that promotes equitable conditions for all to succeed by:

  • fostering a supportive climate – valuing equity and diversity, and encouraging work/life balance, and
  • addressing under-representation of designated groups by supporting and promoting equity considerations.

Back to top

Potential metrics

Category

Tier

Details

Potential metrics (subject to disciplinary norms)

Excellence of Researcher

Tier 1

Should be acknowledged as doing world-class, innovative research by arms-length international leaders in their field.

  • Consistent record of high quality research published in high impact, peer-reviewed journals and/or conference proceedings

Tier 2

Should be emerging world-class researchers who have demonstrated creativity in a particular research field.

  • Early career awards and Prizes (e.g. Ontario Early Researcher Awards; Scientific Society Young Investigator Awards)

Tier 1 / Tier 2

World-class (Tier 1) or emerging world-class (Tier 2) researchers demonstrating academic leadership

  • Active participation as an academic citizen
    • accepting invitations to speak at leading conferences
    • serving as external examiners on PhD defenses at other universities
    • refereeing important papers or participating on editorial boards of journals
    • performing administrative roles in academic societies,
    • adjudicating significant awards or grant proposals
  • Receiving prestigious research awards
  • Citation counts or other use or mention of research results

Record of research results /

Tier 1

Should be recognized by their peers as international leaders in their field(s).

  • Invited lectures at international conferences, particularly keynote addresses
  • International grants and prizes
  • Invitations to serve on expert panels (grant review; government advisory; University program review) in and outside of Canada

Tier 2

Should have demonstrated the potential to achieve international recognition in their field(s) in the next five to ten years.

  • International meetings attended and talks given
  • International collaborations established

Training record

Tier 1

Should have a superior record of attracting and supervising graduate students and Postdoctoral fellows, as evidenced by a continuous record of supervision at multiple levels.

  • Overall numbers of graduate student and PDF trainees
  • Trainees have obtained scholarships, awards and prizes (particularly external ones)
  • Trainees have published and/or given conference presentations (differentiating between M.Sc., Ph.D., and PDF)
  •  Some trainees have successfully completed their programs and are pursuing further studies or have found suitable employment

Please contact Office of Research if you have any questions. 

Date modified: November 2018