Justification for curriculum changes

Academic units (e.g., departments, schools, faculties) typically initiate curriculum proposals when there is a clear academic, professional, or institutional rationale.

Common justifications

Academic quality and currency

  • Keeping the curriculum up to date with advances in scholarship, technology, methods, or disciplinary standards.
  • Addressing gaps or outdated content in existing courses or programs.
  • Improving intellectual coherence or sequencing within a program (e.g., clearer learning progression from introductory to advanced courses).

Program review and assessment findings

  • Responding to formal program review recommendations (internal or external).
  • Using assessment evidence showing that learning outcomes are not being met as intended.
  • Strengthening program viability, such as improving enrolment, retention, or graduate outcomes.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion

  • Embedding inclusive perspectives and practices within the curriculum.
  • Addressing systemic gaps or biases in content, pedagogy, or assessment.
  • Expanding access for underrepresented or non-traditional student populations.

Student learning and experience

  • Enhancing student learning outcomes, based on assessment data or accreditation feedback.
  • Responding to student demand, interest, or feedback (e.g., requests for new topics, specializations, or delivery modes).
  • Improving accessibility and flexibility, such as introducing online, hybrid, experiential, or interdisciplinary options.
  • Reducing time to degree or unnecessary barriers to progression.

Strategic and institutional alignment

  • Advancing institutional priorities or strategic plans, such as interdisciplinarity, Indigenous initiatives, experiential learning, or global engagement.
  • Supporting new institutional initiatives, partnerships, or research strengths.
  • Differentiating the institution or unit within a competitive higher education landscape.

Workforce, professional, and societal needs

  • Alignment with labour market trends and employer expectations.
  • Meeting professional or licensure requirements that have changed.
  • Preparing students for emerging careers or societal challenges (e.g., sustainability, data literacy, equity, artificial intelligence).

Efficiency and sustainability

  • Streamlining curriculum by eliminating redundant or low-enrolment courses.
  • Reallocating resources more effectively, including faculty expertise and teaching capacity.
  • Clarifying program requirements for students, advisors, and instructors.

Interdisciplinary and collaborative opportunities

  • Creating interdisciplinary programs or courses that reflect complex real-world problems.
  • Leveraging collaborations with other academic units, industry, or community partners.
  • Supporting joint degrees, minors, certificates, etc.