Objective O1:
By 2019, develop a long-term Climate and Energy Action Plan to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050; decrease Scope 1/2 emissions by 17.5% by 2025
Progress:
Completed (2019) | Started (2025) |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
Description:
Waterloo completed development of its Shift:Neutral climate action plan throughout 2019, which was approved in early 2020.
As implementation proceeds, progress will need to be accelerated to offset the increase of grid emission changes and a growing campus. In future reports, the indicator will pivot to the 2025 target within Shift:Neutral as well as actions completed to advance the target, some of which are already underway.
Indicators

Development of Shift: Neutral climate action plan



Interactive Data
Weather was a significant factor accounting for increased heating demand on the campus during 2018. However, there were some changes to electricity emission factors from the Province of Ontario that impacted historical emissions, and Waterloo has adjusted its inventory accordingly. Waterloo has expanded tracking of its Scope 3 emissions to include student and employee commuting emissions, which are generated primarily from driving and transit use. These show up as a new source of emissions in 2018’s inventory, but would be assumed to be proportionally similar for previous years when data was not yet available to the level of detail needed to complete an emissions assessment (see: Transportation).
Actions and Accomplishments
2020:
- Approved Shift:Neutral climate action plan
- Launched campus-wide energy audit to facilitate holistic understanding of energy-savings opportunities across campus buildings
- Began drafting low-carbon design standards for new construction
2019:
- Released tender for campus-wide energy audit and selected preferred proponent
- Working Group held 6 public open-house drop-in sessions and attended various events to seek student and employee input on climate action plan, reaching over 200 participants
- Working Group held workshop with key staff, administration, faculty, and student stakeholders to discuss draft directions and background
- Drafted, refined, and brought forward Shift:Neutral climate action plan for approval
2018:
- University formed a Working Group of the President’s Advisory Committee on Environmental Sustainability to develop the long-term action plan.
- Working Group developed background paper on draft directions
- Working Group retained consulting firm to provide outline on feasibility studies required for development of a net-neutral strategy
- Working Group completed business-as-usual forecast, and interviews with other campuses
Boundary
All campuses. Affiliated and Federated Institutions of Waterloo provide data to include in this report for purposes of transparency, but are separate from the goals and actions of the University of Waterloo.
Methodology
Natural Gas, Fuel Oil, Water, Electricity, T&D Losses, Gasoline, Diesel:
Source data was taken from annual billing and calculated against relevant emissions factors. Waterloo uses the emissions factors provided by the Province of Ontario through Canada’s National Inventory Report to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Province updates electricity emissions annually for the period three years previous, and provides an estimate for the period two years previous. Canada also refined the methodology for calculating diesel and gasoline emissions from mobile combustion. These were retroactively updated and have no material change in emissions quantities for the campus.
Business Travel – Mileage:
Source data is generated through the University of Waterloo’s Concur expense claim system. Since employees are reimbursed at a flat rate per kilometer, the financial data can be converted into distance travelled. This is multiplied against a standard emissions factor for a sales-weighted average vehicle fuel efficiency and respective emission factor.
Commuting:
Source data is collected from the student and employee travel survey developed and hosted by the TravelWise program at the Region of Waterloo. The survey asks participants to describe the mode of travel they use to get to campus, the distance they travel, and the class of vehicle they drive, if applicable. The survey also gathers information on whether they are full or part time, and whether they are students, staff, or faculty. The distance travelled is compounded by weighting factors above to extrapolate over the course of a year, and is multiplied by NRCAN rated vehicle fuel efficiency for the class of vehicle selected. The outputs are then weighted according to each respective population (student, staff, faculty).
Trips by walking, cycling, and teleworking are assumed to have zero emissions. Travel by carpooling uses the same methodology as above, but is divided by two to reflect double occupancy of a vehicle. Travel by transit uses the same methodology as above, but is multiplied against an emissions factor per passenger kilometer traveled rather than vehicle fuel efficiency.
The survey tool is released in the fall and respondents are asked to select the trips taken to campus over the previous week. It also asks respondents their primary mode of travel, and whether that mode shifts seasonally. For the purposes of emissions calculations, the seasonally-adjusted primary mode of travel is reported here. The emissions calculations based on the trips-over-past-week methodology is statistically identical (within the survey’s margin of error).
Waste:
Source data comes from invoices for waste sent to landfill, and is multiplied against standardized emission factors developed by the Region of Waterloo. Diverted waste streams are not included as part of the emissions calculation.
Since the University of Waterloo collects all waste on campus in aggregate, emissions related to waste are recorded under the University’s section and omitted from the Affiliated and Federated Institutions of Waterloo, although they would be responsible for a portion of the waste generation.
In the data tables, emissions are classified based on the scopes developed in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Unit | Source | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural Gas | kgCO2-e/m3 | NIR (2020) | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 | 1.89831 |
Light Fuel Oil | kgCO2-e/L | NIR (2020) | 2.76194 | 2.76194 | 2.76194 | |||||||
Heavy Fuel Oil | kgCO2-e/L | EPA | 2.96125 | |||||||||
Water | kgCO2-e/m3 | SWR (2013a) | 0.08125 | 0.06000 | 0.06000 | 0.04125 | 0.02438 | 0.02500 | 0.02313 | 0.01063 | 0.01363 | 0.01812 |
Waste | kgCO2-e/kg | SWR (2013b) | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 | 0.19000 |
Electricity | kgCO2-e/kWh | NIR (2019b) | 0.13000 | 0.01100 | 0.09600 | 0.06600 | 0.03900 | 0.0400 | 0.0370 | 0.01700 | 0.0290 | 0.0290 |
Transmission and Distribution Losses |
kgCO2-e/kWh | NIR (2019b) | 0.01000 | 0.01400 | 0.01400 | 0.01400 | 0.00100 | 0.0000 | 0.0030 | 0.0030 | 0.0010 | 0.0010 |
Business Travel - Mileage |
kgCO2-e/km | SWR (2012) | 0.21378 | 0.21378 | 0.21378 | |||||||
Commuting - Car |
kgCO2-e/km | SWR (2012) | 0.21378 | 0.21378 | ||||||||
Commuting - Transit |
kgCO2-e/ passenger-km |
SWR (2012) | 0.0665 | 0.0665 | ||||||||
Fleet - Unleaded Fuel |
kgCO2-e/L | NIR (2019) | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 | 2.31675 |
Fleet - Diesel Fuel |
kgCO2-e/L | NIR (2019) | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 | 2.74072 |
(EPA) US Environmental Protection Agency guidance for emissions from combustion
(NIR 2019) From Canada’s 2019 National Inventory Report – Part 2
(NIR 2019b) From Canada’s 2019 National Inventory Report – Part 3
(SWR 2013a) From Sustainable Waterloo Region’s Water Emissions Guidance Paper
(SWR 2013b) From Sustainable Waterloo Region’s Waste Emissions Guidance Paper
(SWR 2012) From Sustainable Waterloo Region's Guide to the Regional Carbon Initiative
Objective O2:
Implement cost-effective and practical strategies to reduce or minimize growth in energy use on campus
Progress: Started
Description: Waterloo’s overall energy consumption continues to increase in aggregate and on an intensity basis. Although some energy efficiency projects have been implemented, they are not enough to offset growth of the campus.
Indicators


Interactive Data
Actions and Accomplishments
2019
- RFP was released and a WalterFedy was selected in Dec. as the successful proponent to lead the energy audit
- Climate Action Plan was drafted in summer and brought to the President in Fall 2019 and was approved
- Lighting retrofits continued
- Plant Operations updated the Energy Conservation Demand Management Plan in June of 2019
2018:
- Plant Operations completed lighting retrofits in Davis Centre and Engineering 2 which will save approximately 198,000 kWh of electricity on an annual basis
- The Sustainability Office included a session on Energy and Climate in the newly-launched Sustainability Certificate
2017:
- Plant Operations completed lighting retrofits in PAC, DC, and MC to update to LED or high-efficiency fluorescent lighting.
Boundary
All campuses. Affiliated and Federated Institutions of Waterloo provide data to include in this report for purposes of transparency, but are separate from the goals and actions of Waterloo.
Methodology
All data is taken from monthly or annual billing statements for actual consumption, and converted to Gigajoules using conversion tables provided by the National Energy Board. Energy intensity was calculated by dividing total energy consumption by total floor area of building space for each year.
To account for variation in weather, in particular cold weather that requires significant heating, Waterloo normalized energy intensity to the number of heating degree days, relative to 2015, for the reporting years beginning in 2015. Prior to 2015, these are reported in raw (not normalized) intensity.
Read alongside total metered usage, this can help understand the energy intensity of the campus while accounting for weather conditions that are outside of the University’s control.