Policies and Accommodations

Policy 71: Student Discipline

All members of the University who have reason to believe that an academic offence has occurred have the responsibility to promptly report the allegation to the Assistant Dean, Undergraduate Policy (Cynthia Richard). Instructors should contact science.integrity@uwaterloo.ca with the names of the student(s), ID#s, and the weight of the assessment. If a rapid informal process is possible, the instructor will get a response indicating they can proceed, and further guidance will be provided.       

Science instructors are expected to be familiar with Policy #71 - Student Discipline as they are responsible for ensuring that academic integrity is supported in their courses. Consistent application of academic integrity guidance is essential to provide fair, accurate assessments of student learning.

Tips for Generative AI: Turnitin does include a detection tool for GenAI (ex. Chat GPT); use this with caution as there are reliability concerns.  Policy 71 allegations need to be supported by more than just GenAI detection tool reports.  Do not submit a student’s work to a GenAI detection tool without their permission.

Instructors could encounter academic offences, such as:

  • Plagiarism; situations of limited paraphrasing but proper citations may be dealt with as poor writing. Use of GenAI also falls under the plagiarism category. 
  • Unauthorized/excessive collaboration 

  • Cheating; unauthorized aid; violation of test regulations 

  • Misrepresentation, e.g., lying; falsifying VIFs or patient records 

  • Impersonation, e.g., clicker misuse; distributing confidential academic material; forged signatures 

  • Theft of intellectual property

Some Policy 71 Principles:

  • Students who receive an allegation are entitled to:          

    • a presumption of innocence;                     

    • be made aware of the case against them;

    • have matters addressed fairly and expeditiously;

    • be accompanied by a support person to any meeting or hearing;               

    • have matters heard by those who are not sitting in judgment of their own actions or decisions;                  

    • know, respond to, and seek clarification of evidence presented by witnesses; and             

    • decisions based on the balance of probabilities with consideration given to University consistency and precedent;        

Some reasons why instructors cannot independently assign a penalty: 

  • Penalties are evaluated based on whether that student has had prior or similar academic offences; Instructors would not be aware of prior offences;  

  • Penalties need to be consistently applied across the faculty and between faculties, and need to be aligned with Policy 71 guidance on penalties; Instructors would not be aware of typical penalties used across the faculty or university for a similar offence; 

  • Penalties need to carefully weigh mitigating and aggravating factors in a consistent fashion, and; 

  • The student may not be a Science student, in which case it would fall to the Associate Dean of the student’s faculty to determine the penalty. 

The Office of Academic Integrity has an informative website containing general institutional views on the importance of academic integrity, and information on best practices useful to both students and instructor. Instructors are encouraged to review these resources to help provide academic integrity guidance to students through coursework and the course syllabus (see below). 

Please send student academic integrity or misconduct questions to science.integrity@uwaterloo.ca. Aziza Chaudhry and Cynthia Richard manage this inbox. 

Posting course grades, returning graded papers, and other privacy issues

FIPPA (Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act) is available on Waterloo’s Information and Privacy website. Universities must abide with this act. It requires that identifying information, such as names or student identification numbers, not be readily available to unauthorized personnel, including other students.

Posting Grades

Policy 46 (Information Management) states clearly that posting of student grades is permitted, as long as certain conditions are met: "Provided the identity of individual students is protected, an instructor may convey information about student academic performance (e.g., grades on assignments, mid-term, or final examinations) by posting results in a public place such as an office door, bulletin board or course website. Final examination and final course grades shall not be posted before the final examination period ends."

It should be noted that Policy 46 also stipulates that final examination and final course grades should be posted only after the final examination period ends – students can view their unofficial grades on Quest beginning the day after the final exam period ends, so posting grades is unnecessary.

Returning Graded Papers

Ideally, graded material should be returned individually to students during class, labs, or office hours (unless written permission has been provided by the student for someone else to pick-up the material); the papers should not be left in a public spaceThe University’s Information and Privacy website (Information and Privacy - Returning assignments and posting grades) includes suggestions for returning graded materialIf none of these options are possible, graded material can be left unattended, if certain steps are taken:

  • Comments and grades are not recorded on the front page;  
  • The graded material is left in the specified pick-up location a maximum of two weeks; 

  • The course outline specifies that graded material will be left in a specified location for up to two weeks and that alternate options will be arranged if requested by students;  

  • The course outline specifies how long unclaimed assignments will be kept (a 1-year period after the end of course is recommended; however, a minimum of 1-month after the course grade becomes official is strongly advised to allow for any Policy 72 grievances to be initiated).

Instructors should note that theft is a real issue and this needs to be considered in deciding how to return graded materialAt best, stolen student work is an inconvenience to studentsMore seriously, it can jeopardize their standing in a course, if they: 1) were not able to see where they went wrong in their work, 2) required the material to study for future course assessments, or 3) had a valid reason to request a re-assessment.

Other Privacy Issues

There are a few other FIPPA-related issues that instructors should be aware of when dealing with students, their quizzes, exams and assignments, and their records.

  • When responding to students via email, instructors may want to include a "disclaimer" in their e-mail signatureA suggestion is: "The information in this message, including any attachments, is privileged and may contain confidential information intended only for the person(s) named aboveAny other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibitedIf you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and permanently delete the original transmission from me, including any attachments, without making a copyThank you."
  • When using voice mail, the only information left in the message should be the caller’s name and contact information as well as the name of the person being sought.  Detailed information should not be left on voice mail.  
  • Only academic advisors and their associated staff should have access to student filesOthers requesting information (e.g., to write a reference letter) should request a copy of the transcript from the appropriate student 

  • Student records must be stored securely. Electronic student records such as those maintained on laptop computers or USB keys present a significant risk to privacy, if lost. It is the responsibility of instructors to ensure that those with access to their students’ information (e.g., teaching assistants) maintain these records in a secure manner.  Data should be encrypted if loss is possible. Consult the IST Device Encryption website for information.  

  • The disposal of student information in both paper and electronic formats must also be managed securely. Hard copies cannot be discarded using regular recycle bins. The university’s approved retention schedules for student information can be found in the ’Student Management’ and ’Teaching and Learning’ sections of WatCLASS (Records Classification and Retention Schedule). Based on experience with lengthy petition and appealed grievance processes, instructors are encouraged to keep electronic student information for two years.

Within Policy 46, Appendix A provides guidance regarding access to and release of student information: within the University; with other universities with government agencies; and with the public.  

The Executive Officer (Mona Skuterud) is the Science contact for instructors and academic advisors with specific FIPPA procedural questions. 

Self-Declarations, Verification of Illness Forms (VIFs) and Extenuating Circumstances

Students have the following three options for declaring an absence. Students are expected to notify their instructor(s) before or within 24 hours of the missed course element. 

  • Short-term Absence: students can self-declare, through Quest, an absence for 2 calendar days or less, during the Formal Lecture Period; a short-term absence can be self-declared for any reason that prevents a student from meeting their academic obligations, with the exception of Laboratory (LAB) and Clinic (CLN) courses/class components (LAB and CLN courses/class components do not qualify for accommodation as a result of a self-declared short-term absence); students are permitted only one self-declared short-term absence accommodation per academic term; no documentation is required. 

  • Covid-19-related Absence: students can self-declare, through Quest, an absence for 10 days or less due to Covid-19 related illness (including vaccination side effects) or a requirement to self-isolate; participation in online course elements may be reasonable, and any participation needs to be consistent across all courses; students are permitted only one self-declared Covid-19 related absence accommodation per academic term; no documentation is required. 

  • VIF DeclarationA VIF is a declaration of absence for students and requires that documentation be provided. Students must refer to their home Faculty's process for VIF submissions. Science VIF information can be found here. See also the Verification of Illness Form (VIF) from Health Services.

  • For extenuating circumstances that are not illness related, for which the VIF is not appropriate, other official documentation is necessary (for example: plane/train/bus tickets, court documents, police reports, death certificates/obituaries/letters from funeral directors, counsellor letters).                           

Important Notes about VIFs: 

VIFs (and self-declarations) are entered into a database (vif.uwaterloo.ca) to track suspicious and habitual use of VIFs. Unusual patterns of use trigger a meeting with the Associate Dean of Science (Teaching and Learning).  Unauthorized use of VIFs may result in allegations of misrepresentation by the Associate Dean.

Student responsibilities: 

Instructor responsibilities:  

  • Decide how to accommodate missed course elements.  

  • Set accommodation policies in their course outlines so students know if accommodations are possible, the type of accommodations, and under what general conditions accommodations may be applied.  

  • Provide expectations: A ‘severe’ incapacitation indicates students are unable to attend class and engage in most academic studies during the period indicated. If they attend classes/labs, submit assignments/reports or write tests/exams during this period, they are at risk of being accused of ‘misrepresentation’; a Policy 71 academic offence.                                       

    • In the absence of stated course rules in the course outline, students will be advised that they should consider not writing tests/exams during the incapacitation period                                   

SUO responsibilities:  

  • Verify VIFs are complete, with no clear indications of fraud. Any suspicious medical documentation should be brought to the attention of the Assistant Dean, Undergraduate Policy and the Academic Integrity Specialist. 

  • Confirm information students submit with their documentation aligns with information presented in the documentation. This confirmation may cause delays in VIF submission completion. 

  • Enter the record in vif.uwaterloo.ca. Information will be automatically emailed to not just the instructor of the missed course element but all the student’s instructors – to minimize the student inconsistently using the VIF (i.e., writing one test but not another during the same incapacitation period). Instructors will see what course(s) have been associated with the VIF. 

  • Educate students about VIF use and responsibilities. 

Accommodating religious observances

Within Waterloo’s ‘Accommodations’ section of the UG calendar’s ‘Academic Regulations Related to Assignments, Tests, and Final Exams’, there is a clear statement on accommodation for students with respect to the more significant religious holidays:

The University acknowledges that, due to the pluralistic nature of the University community, some students may seek accommodations on religious grounds. Accordingly, students must consult with their instructor(s) within two weeks of the announcement of the due date for which accommodation is being sought. Failure to provide a timely request will decrease the likelihood of providing an accommodation.

The statement that “students must consult with their instructor(s) within two weeks of the announcement of the due date” is a key one and ensures that there is ample time for instructors to make appropriate accommodations for their studentsThere are some observances that do not warrant accommodationIf students have a different interpretation, research will be undertaken on a case-by-case basis.

The Office of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion & Anti-racism (EDI-R) website includes a chart listing religious and spiritual days of  observance that instructors may choose to consider when establishing assignment deadlines and/or final examination and test dates. 

Instructors are encouraged to reach out to equity@uwaterloo.ca if they have any questions about a religious accommodation request. AccessAbility Services (AAS) manages non-disability OHRC (Ontario Human Rights Commission) accommodations for students looking for formal accommodations related to their religious practices.

When considering accommodation requests, instructors should consider that:  

  • Elective arrangements like travel are not grounds to miss course elements (see the same calendar section)  

  • Instructors are not obliged to make accommodations for events like religious weddings (although they can) because these religious ceremonies are not religious observances

Emergencies: service disruptions, weather, and fire

For recommended actions to take when service disruptions interrupt the online learning environments used for required course activities visit: Service interruptions in the Online Learning Environment – Guidelines for Instructors. 

Instructors, and their course proctors, should familiarize themselves with University storm closure and fire alarm evacuation procedures, particularly as they impact tests and exams: 

There are no equivalent fire alarm procedures for in-term tests, but instructors are encouraged to adopt the principles of the final exam guidelines and ensure their proctors are familiar with these guidelines. Instructors need to consider whether the in-term test can be re-scheduled or whether the weight of the test should be shifted to another course element.