University of Waterloo
Department of English Language and Literature
ENGL 210J - Technical Editing
Instructor: Dr. Clive Forrester
Term: Winter 2019
Class times: 2:30pm - 3:50pm M,W
Classroom: HH150
Office hours: Room HH141, Mon. 12-2pm (or by appointment)
Email: clive.forrester@uwaterloo.caext: 37905
Course Description:
This course is intended to introduce participants to the principles and procedures of technical editing. We will draw on examples from manufacturing, the sciences, and the legal field in an effort to build competence and proficiency in the different levels of editing. Material for editing will be drawn both from real world cases as well as originally created by class participants with the goal of engaging in professional editing techniques. Participants will finally be introduced to the basics of working with editing software.
Learning Outcomes:
At the end of this course, participants should be able to:
- Edit and improve overall readability of a variety of document types
- Describe the different levels of editing
- Understand the principles of editing for different genres of writing
- Create original material for use in editing demonstrations
Recommended Texts: (chapters will be added to LEARN)
Friend, C. and Challenger, D. (2014). Contemporary Editing. Routledge. NY.
Garner, Bryan A. Legal writing in plain English: A text with exercises. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Harmon, Joseph E., and Alan G. Gross. The craft of scientific communication. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2010.
Stainton, Elsie Myers. The fine art of copyediting. 2nd ed., New York, Columbia University Press, 2002.
Module |
Week |
Date |
Topic |
Reading & Assignment |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction Types and Purposes of Technical Editing |
1 |
Jan 7 |
Course Introduction ● Course structure and objectives ● Methods of assessment ●Expectations ● Practice exercise in editing |
|||
Jan 9 |
Levels of Editing ● Communication in the technical arena ● Different types and purposes of editing |
Cont. Ed.: Ch. 1, pp. 3-10 |
||||
Editing for the Manufacturing Industry |
2 |
Jan 14 |
Culture of Editing ● Editing best practices ● Ethical considerations in professional editing |
Cont. Ed.: Ch. 12, pp. 277-285 |
||
Jan 16 |
Editing product manuals ● Components of the manual ● Editing operational and maintenance instructions |
|||||
3 |
Jan 21 |
Editing Workshop - Intro ● Product manual editing exercise |
||||
Editing for Journalism and the Media |
Jan 23 |
Editing in the media ● Style and function of media writing ● Checking news articles for readability ● Editing for social impact ● Fact-checking stories |
Cont. Editing: Ch. 3, pp. 45-51 |
|||
4 |
Jan 28 |
|||||
Jan 30 |
Editing Workshop - Journalism (Groups 1&2) |
Cont. Editing: Ch. 3, pp. 52-74 |
||||
5 |
Feb 4 |
Journalism Editing Test |
||||
Editing for the Legal Profession |
Feb 6 |
Editing in the legal field ● Legalese and communication in the law ● Converting legal writing to plain English ● Checking to maintain legal integrity |
Legal Writing: Ch. 1, pp. 3-10 |
|||
6 |
Feb 11 |
|||||
Feb 13 |
Workshop - Legal Writing (Groups 3&4) |
Legal Writing: Ch. 2, pp. 17-30 |
||||
7 |
Feb 18 |
READING WEEK - NO CLASSES |
||||
Feb 20 |
||||||
8 |
Feb 25 |
Legal Editing Test |
||||
Editing for Books and Research Projects |
Feb 27 |
Publication Ready ● Editing short stories/manuscripts ● Editing major research and dissertations ● Using multiple style guides |
Fine Art of Copyediting: Ch. 3, pp. 17-20 |
|||
9 |
Mar 4 |
|||||
Mar 6 |
Editing Workshop - Fiction (Groups 5&6) |
Fine Art of Copyediting: Ch. 3, pp. 20-25 |
||||
10 |
Mar 11 |
Fictional Editing Test |
||||
10 |
||||||
Editing Scientific Language |
Mar 13 |
Editing Scientific Work ● Scientific language - style, conventions and usage ● Editing scientific language for accuracy ● Editing scientific work for public consumption |
Craft of Sci. Comm.: Ch. 14, pp. 187-195 |
|||
11 |
Mar 18 |
Editing Workshop - Scientific Writing (Groups 7&8) |
Craft of Sci. Comm.: Ch. 15 |
|||
Mar 20 |
Scientific Editing Test |
|||||
12 |
Mar 25 |
Project Feedback (from external partners) |
||||
Mar 27 |
Course Wrap-Up |
Assessment Breakdown:
- Participation in group activity and editing workshop (20%: 15% executing workshop + 5% workshop attendance): Each class participant will be assigned to a group and each group will conduct an editing workshop (1hour) on one of the areas covered in class. The workshop involves the creation of original material by the group as well as an interactive demonstration of editing.
- Individual editing portfolio (40%; 10% each X 4): Each participant will submit an editing portfolio consisting of examples of edited material from the four areas of editing covered in the course.
- Module Tests (40%; 10% each x 4): Throughout the course, a total of 4 short tests will be issued for participants to complete, covering content from the course readings.
Keeping in Touch With Me
Feel free to stop by during office hours and have a chat about your writing. If for some reason you can’t come to the scheduled office hours, we can make an appointment to meet virtually via Skype or Facetime. Most importantly, do not wait until you feel completely overwhelmed to seek help. Let’s start talking as early as possible.
Experimental: This year, I will be implementing the use of a communication tool called “Slack.” It operates like a text messaging app, but designed for business purposes, so it can share documents and integrate other applications. The difference between this tool and email is that you can communicate with me in real-time via text or send a phone call if necessary. Join the ENGL210J Slack group at this link.
Academic Integrity
In order to maintain a culture of academic integrity, members of the University of Waterloo community are expected to promote honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility. See theUWaterloo Academic Integrity Webpage (https://uwaterloo.ca/academic-integrity/)and theArts Academic Integrity Office Webpage (http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/current-undergraduates/academic-responsibility)for more information.
Discipline
A student is expected to know what constitutes academic integrity to avoid committing academic offenses and to take responsibility for his/her actions. A student who is unsure whether an action constitutes an offense, or who needs help in learning how to avoid offenses (e.g., plagiarism, cheating) or about “rules” for group work/collaboration should seek guidance from the course professor, academic advisor, or the undergraduate associate dean. For information on categories of offenses and types of penalties, students should refer toPolicy 71, Student Discipline (http://www.adm.uwaterloo.ca/infosec/Policies/policy71.htm). For typical penalties check Guidelines for the Assessment of Penalties (http://www.adm.uwaterloo.ca/infosec/guidelines/penaltyguidelines.htm).