The current election is for six directors:
- four at-large Directors, for a 2-year term
- one teaching stream faculty Director, for a 2-year term
- one director representing Mathematics, for a 1-year term
All terms beginning July 1, 2025.
Each candidate was invited to submit a candidate information form; candidates' answers have not been altered in any way.
To get a sense of what qualifications you might want to look for in a candidate, learn more about being a Board member.
Voting runs from 9 a.m. on Monday March 24 to 1:30 p.m. on Friday, April 4, 2025.
The candidates

At-large: Janice Aurini
Why I want to serve on the FAUW Board of Directors:
I am seeking re-election for another two-year term on the FAUW Board of Directors. Over the past two-years, we have built a solid foundation, but there is still important work to be done. I want to continue supporting initiatives that enhance our workplace and community, including increasing member engagement, strengthening communication and transparent decision-making, and upholding academic freedom and viewpoint diversity.
Skills and experience that contribute to my effectiveness on the Board:
- In addition to serving on FAUW, I have held roles as Chair and Associate Chair, and have served as a member of DTPC, FPR, DACA, Chair Search, UG Senate and Arts Faculty Council Executive committees. These experiences have provided me with a working understanding of how the university operates, including UW policies and processes, and the MoA.
- Within this institutional and policy context, I have offered practical solutions and alternative points of view, responded to member concerns, and guided the strategic direction of FAUW.
- I value collaborative decision-making and maintaining constructive working relationships on the Board. I approach discussions with an open mind, ask questions, and aim to gain a deeper understanding of the issues.
My approach to collaboration and representing all FAUW members:
Since joining the FAUW Board in 2023, I have worked to restore it as a functional body that acts in the best interest of its members, respects the open exchange of ideas, and provides members with the information they need to make informed decisions. On the Board, my responsibility is to uphold the MoA and support initiatives that speak to the needs and interests of the wider membership. If re-elected, I will continue to work to strengthen our members’ confidence in the integrity, transparency, and collegial governance of FAUW.
At-large: Hans De Sterck
As a faculty member with cross-university experience as graduate chair, centre director, department chair, and senator, with your support I will represent you serving as a member of the FAUW Board. I started at Waterloo in 2004 as an assistant professor in the Department of Applied Mathematics, and am now a professor and chair of the department. I care deeply about defending and upholding key academic values such as academic freedom, collegial governance, excellence in research and teaching, and human rights.
In Waterloo's collegial governance system, FAUW is key in negotiating our working conditions and advocating for member rights. In the current challenging budget times, I believe faculty members have an important role to play in proactively helping the university set directions through the various facets of our collegial governance system. FAUW is a crucial component of this, and I am keen to contribute my energy and experience to advance the interests of faculty members at the university as a FAUW Board member.
I believe I have substantial experience at the university that will enable me to be an effective FAUW Board member. I have interacted with various parts of the university pursuing interdisciplinary research interests with centres and institutes. As a graduate chair, centre director, and department chair, I have learned a lot about many aspects of faculty members' teaching and research roles, and I have gained valuable insight into how university decision making works at the level of departments and faculties. I am currently serving on the Math Dean's nominating committee and on the nominating committee for the next President of the university, and I am serving as a senator representing faculty members on Senate.
In terms of collaboration, I am a strong believer in working as a team towards common goals, with open and constructive communication and respect for different views. We're all in the same boat and need to further the interests of all FAUW members, which go hand in hand with the success of the University as a whole. To do so, I believe at FAUW we have to continue putting effort into fostering a culture of broad dialogue and engagement among faculty members. I think the essence of Waterloo as a university is professors providing high-level education to students grounded in research and connected with the world. As a member of the Board, I will do my best to help FAUW in furthering the interests of all its members.


At-large: Rob Gorbet
I am excited at the prospect of returning to the FAUW Board of Directors for a second consecutive term. I’ve been at Waterloo in various capacities since starting my undergraduate here in 1987. I’ve taught in three different faculties; sat on Dean, VP, and Presidential hiring committees; served multiple terms on both UW Senate (including Senate Exec and Senate Long Range Planning committees) and Board of Governors; and was Chair of the Department of Knowledge Integration for 9 years. I am currently a Senator and am running for reappointment as Senate representative to the Board of Governors.
Over my nearly 40 years here I’ve seen Waterloo from many different perspectives, and I have a keen sense of how things work at various scales and among different constituencies. My interest and experience with interdisciplinary teaching and research has led me to build what I believe is a strong network and a lot of goodwill in all parts of campus.
I have a deep interest in issues of governance and procedure, and how governance structures might provide greater opportunities for member input. This is why I volunteered to sit on FAUW’s Governance Review Committee which has been meeting biweekly since December.
I know that there is a lot of concern and confusion about University finances. While I don’t believe the administration is planning to invoke program redundancy or financial exigency, I do believe that FAUW has a duty to be prepared should they do so. That is why I proposed and am leading a FAUW working group looking at the details of these procedures. I am also working with OCUFA and other FAUW Directors to get a clearer picture of the budget situation, so that FAUW and its members can be better informed.
As a critical design thinker, I strive to consider any set of complex observations incomplete, recognizing this admits multiple possible explanations. In that context, good decision-making requires reducing uncertainty by gathering data and perspectives to understand these multiple explanations and, in human systems, the motivations behind them. Considering multiple perspectives is key to good, collaborative decision-making and effective collegial governance, and this is how I approach my FAUW work.
The FAUW Directorship is a voluntary position with a lot of weight and responsibility. The work is hard but meaningful, and it attracts those who believe strongly in a common cause. In my first term as a FAUW at-large Director, I’ve enjoyed being able to work with a team of dedicated individuals who bring different perspectives to issues but are united in FAUW’s common goal of serving the membership. I believe we’ve accomplished a lot in that time to improve FAUW’s operational capacity, communication, and effectiveness.
In sum, I am a collaborative colleague with a strong network across campus, and I believe firmly in the importance of FAUW’s work and collegial governance, especially at this particular moment in time. With your vote, I can continue the important work I have been doing on your behalf as a FAUW Director.
At-large: Mario Ioannidis
I have served FAUW as Director continuously since 2020 in several roles, including as a member of the Faculty Relations Committee (FRC) and as co-chair of the Salary Anomaly Working Group (2020-2021). Prior to that, I served the University as Academic Colleague to the Council of Ontario Universities (COU) and a member of the Senate Long Range Planning Committee (2016-2019). I am currently about to serve a second term as department chair (2025-2029). Through these rather varied engagements I have developed a deep appreciation of collegial governance as a preferred political arrangement and a prerequisite for academic freedom. I came to understand that the stability of this arrangement is a function of how it adjudicates between the competing interests of those who are part of it. How well does our collegial governance succeeds at managing inevitable political tensions, and what can we do to more effectively deal with existing and future tensions? In answering this question, I advocate for a collegial governance that continues to adjust and refine itself in response to the voices of its members, as they exercise their powers of mutual recognition and seek to resolve the tensions they encounter within the system.


At-large: James Nugent
As a FAUW Director, I would work tirelessly to solicit, articulate, and represent the interests of faculty towards the betterment of our university. Budget constraints are impacting our members: contracts are not being renewed; faculties are being restructured; elective courses canceled; staff and TA support reduced; while supervisory and committee responsibilities increase due to the ongoing hiring freeze. We can and should work collaboratively with the administration to confront financial constraints; however, FAUW exists because our interests do not always align with the administration’s. How might FAUW brainstorm with faculty and collaborate with staff and student groups on campus as well as OCUFA, CAUT, and colleagues at other universities to develop and present alternative university budget proposals aimed at avoiding layoffs and program redundancies? FAUW can also play an important role in helping address the structural funding crisis facing our sector. Through innovative campaigns, we could raise public understanding and appreciation of the academy. For example, FAUW could sponsor public lectures in neighbourhoods across the region to share the exciting work we do.
I fully support FAUW’s efforts to improve grassroots membership engagement by facilitating FAUW-side chats, expanding office hours, and sponsoring member-driven initiatives. FAUW committees are also doing essential work and I would like to empower them to share ideas and proposals directly with the membership. Transparent governance encourages meaningful membership participation.
Similarly, more open governance will better guide the Board in terms of how our membership wants to proceed on strategic and contentious issues. Reaching consensus within the Board is of course desirable, but we should expect and respect that academics may not always agree. Rather than see this as a weakness, disagreements arising within the Board should help stimulate discussion within our membership. Minutes of FAUW Board meetings (open session) should be published to a members-only section of our website. Inviting open discussions ahead of time will help resolve or crystallize debates, thereby ensuring we use general membership meetings more efficiently for decision-making.
As a Board member I would support deepening FAUW’s commitment to equity, such as: ensuring access to day care places on campus; providing robust legal support for members experiencing violations of the Human Rights Code and the MOA; negotiating accommodations for members; continued support of faculty hired through the Black Excellence and Indigenous Excellence hiring initiatives; and continued support for the Gender and Sexual Diversity Working Group and W3+. Our membership has diverse needs and our university thrives when each member feels welcomed and supported on campus. Similarly, FAUW needs to actively defend the academic freedom of members—especially in times of political turmoil, organizational restructuring, and job insecurity.
I am an outspoken member of UW Senate. As an active member of FAUW, I raised alarm about the administration’s use of complex employment agreements; promoted debate within FAUW regarding the university’s response to demonstrations on campus; and previously contributed to FAUW’s Climate Justice Working Group. I am working with FAUW to carefully examine our MOA in anticipation of potential financial exigency and program redundancy.
At-large: Mark Oremus
I am pleased to put forward my candidacy for a seat on FAUW’s Board of Directors. I am an epidemiologist by training and a Professor in the School of Public Health Sciences (SPHS). I started at the University of Waterloo in 2014 and spent the prior six years as a faculty member at McMaster University.
My priority on the Board of Directors will be to support FAUW’s continued pursuit of an apolitical and non-ideological stance that enables it to focus solely on its core mandate, namely the promotion of optimal working conditions and employment terms for faculty. This focus will enable FAUW to pursue a more assertive approach and ultimately achieve fair and respectful working conditions matching other top-tier universities in Canada. My multidisciplinary background in political science and public policy makes me sensitive to the needs and concerns of faculty from across the arts and sciences. Additionally, all my research has been collaborative and prefaced on the need to reach consensus. These experiences will allow me to bridge the interests of faculty across campus, which is crucial to FAUW’s effectiveness, since the latter is directly proportional to the unity of its members.
I will also bring a tradition of labour sensitivity to the Board of Directors. I served on FAUW’s Council of Representatives and I regularly attend FAUW meetings. As a youngster working my way through school, I was a factory worker and proud member of United Steelworkers of America Local 2843. In conclusion, as a member of FAUW’s Board of Directors, my goal is to ensure the faculty association remains an apolitical, non-ideological, and aggressive promoter of optimal employment terms for you. I thank you for considering my candidacy and I look forward to serving you on the Board.
Mark's faculty profile on the School of Public Health Sciences website.


At-large: Bruce Reed
I joined the FAUW BoD as a member-at-large July 2023. At that time FAUW was in crisis, and as a new member I believe I helped to right the ship. We need a strong and united FAUW BoD to face some of the challenges that are on the horizon. With 2 years of experience under my belt, I feel I have sufficient institutional knowledge, and I'm ready to apply this knowledge towards further actions and leadership roles within FAUW. In particular, we must be wary of the present financial situation and ensure that our junior faculty will have safe and secure positions of employment, and that our memorandum of agreement with the University Administration is consistently upheld and that there is good faith on both sides in any forthcoming negotiations. I strive to help hold groups together and I will always seek common ground for the benefit of all members.
Mathematics: Peter Wood
THIS POSITION IS ACCLAIMED
My name is Peter Wood and I am an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream in the Math Undergrad Group. I’ve been a faculty member in Math since 2001, serving as Director of the Math Business programs for 12 years and now as Assistant Dean for Online Education and Educational Technologies.
I’ve been involved with FAUW for about 2 years, serving as the Chair of the Teaching Stream Faculty Members Committee (formerly the Lecturer’s Committee). I also was the co-chair of the P76/77 Policy Development Committee, which I helped bring to a successful completion. Additionally, I am currently a member of the P12 (Bereavement and Compassionate Care) Policy Development Committee.
Having served on the FAUW Board as a non-voting member over the last approximately 2 years, I can say that FAUW is in a better place now than it was a few years ago, and I hope to help continue that trajectory. It is important, perhaps now more than ever, that we have a constructive and functional Faculty Association.


Teaching stream: Erin O'Connell
Why I want to join the FAUW Board of Directors
I am seeking re-election to the FAUW Board of Directors in order to contribute to our academic community and foster a vibrant workplace. After becoming the Teaching Stream Director of the FAUW Board in 2023, I had the opportunity learn more about university processes and policies, as well as the efforts that FAUW takes to improve working conditions on campus. I believe the FAUW Board has made tremendous progress in many areas over this time period and am hoping to continue this work over the next two years! This includes continuing to support academic freedom and institutional neutrality; improving communications and transparency with the goal of increasing member engagement; and advocating for improved faculty working conditions. As a FAUW Board Director, I see our primary responsibility as ensuring adherence to the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) and university policy, while also promoting opportunities for convivial and productive faculty interactions and experiences on campus.
Skills and experience that would contribute to my effectiveness on the Board
I believe I have the skills and experience to make an effective director for three key reasons:
- I have experience working in roles that require in-depth understanding of university functioning, the MoA, and university policy. These roles include: Teaching Stream representative on FAUW’s Board of Directors since 2023; member of FAUW’s Teaching Stream Committee since 2023; Associate Chair, Undergraduate in my department since 2021; and member of Senate from 2018 – 2024.
- While these experiences allow me to bring a breadth of knowledge to the Board, I am also open to hearing all sides of an issue, to better understand how the issue impacts different groups of Faculty members across campus. I aim to ask questions and learn more, as needed, to better inform the Board’s decisions.
- I approach problem-solving in a collaborative and conciliatory way, by focusing on the underlying challenges and exploring various options to resolve these challenges. I strive to maintain integrity and the highest ethical conduct throughout my professional activities.
My approach to collaboration and representing all FAUW members
I believe in a collaborative approach to decision-making. Whether this is by listening to various perspectives on an issue, or exploring different types of solutions, I aim to be open and willing to pivot, as needed, when better options or new information arises. I also value working in collegially with university administration, to achieve the university mandate to advance learning and knowledge through teaching, research, and scholarship. I believe this collaborative and cooperative approach is particularly relevant during these turbulent and difficult times.
Teaching stream: Su-Yin Tan
“Our working conditions are our students’ learning conditions” is a mantra that summarizes my motivation for running for the FAUW Board. I have always believed that enhancing the economic, professional, social, and political power of teaching stream faculty improves the quality of student education and uplifts our university as a whole. Striving for equitable working conditions of teaching stream faculty is not only a personal passion, but a way of life that informs all that I do.
My vision for teaching stream faculty is based on equity, justice, and the fundamental belief that our terms and conditions of employment should be equivalent to those of our tenure stream counterparts. We fulfill critical roles at the university and enable it to function. This means that we deserve equal pay scales, equivalent rights to sabbatical leave, access to time and resources for professional/career development, and recognition for scholarly activities, including the academic freedom to apply for grants. Unfortunately, this is quite different from reality. Recent policy revisions have achieved appointment title changes and a clarified path to permanence, but at a cost to others. Many definite-term faculty have not been renewed, face worsened working conditions, and are likely to bear the brunt of the financial crisis. It is more important than ever for FAUW to advocate for the protection of definite-term faculty.
Since being hired in 2008, I have substantial FAUW experience having served as an original member of the Lecturers Committee when it was founded in 2015. My advocacy work includes serving as Lecturers Committee Chair, FAUW Board Director, and member of the Executive Committee and Faculty Relations Committee. I currently serve on the Academic and Freedom Committee, providing confidential support to members with workplace issues. I have witnessed first-hand how faculty relations with the university work and maintain a critical viewpoint that systemic and structural change is required. I firmly believe that FAUW, as our sole representative for determining employment conditions, could and needs to do better.
I have spent many years contributing to Policy 76/77 revisions, consulting widely across campus and outside of the university, and researching teaching stream appointments at comparative institutions. I am the first to admit that much work remains to be done, including an appeal process for contract renewals and clearer terms for promotion to associate and full professorship ranks. How do we convince the university to hire into probationary/permanence tracks rather than definite-term contracts? Pressing issues outside of Policy 76/77 include equitable workload and teaching loads, teaching assessment and performance review (e.g., peer reviews, student course perceptions), and salary equity.
If elected, I promise to tirelessly and tenaciously advocate for improved working conditions and equitable terms of appointment for teaching stream faculty, while upholding personal and professional integrity, ethical conduct, and informed judgment. Most of all, I will always strive for a faculty association where members come first. I hope to bring lived experience and different perspectives to the FAUW Board, which will further enrich, inform, and advance progressive changes within our faculty community.
