You are here

Ori Friedman


Head shot of Dr. Ori FriedmanBSc (Toronto), PhD (Boston College)

Contact information


uWaterloo Child Cognition Lab home page

View my profile on Google Scholar or ResearchGate

Research interests

I am interested in children's social cognitive development and many related topics. My research investigates issues including how young children understand thoughts, emotions, and actions; how children think about ownership, rights, and responsibilities; and how children engage in pretend-play and understand the distinction between fantasy and reality. 

Journal articles and chapters

  • Bowman-Smith, C. K., Shtulman, A., & Friedman, O. (in press). Distant lands make for distant possibilities: Children view improbable events as more possible in far-away locations. Developmental Psychology. ​

  • Nancekivell, S. E. & Friedman, O. (in press). I owe you an explanation: Children’s beliefs about when people are obligated to explain their actions. In T. Lombrozo, J. Knobe, & S. Nichols (Eds.), Oxford studies in experimental philosophy (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ​

  • Nancekivell, S. E., Friedman, O., & Gelman, S. A. (in press). Ownership matters: People possess a naive theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences

  • Turpin, M. H., Meyers, E. A., Fugelsang, J. A., Friedman, O., & Bialek, M. (in press). Sunk cost bias and withdrawal aversion. American Journal of Bioethics. Commentary on Wilkinson, Butcherine, & Savulescu.

  • Baer, C. & Friedman, O. (2018). Fitting the message to the listener: Children selectively mention general and specific facts. Child Development, 89, 461-475. 

  • Bialek, M., Fugelsang, J., & Friedman, O. (2018). Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 451-457. 

  • Bowman-Smith, C. K., Goulding, B. W., & Friedman, O. (2018). Children hold owners responsible when property causes harm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1191-1199.

  • Doan, T., Friedman, O., & Denison, S. (2018). Beyond belief: The probability-based notion of surprise in children. Emotion, 18, 1163-1173. 

  • Friedman, O., Pesowski, M. L. & Goulding, B. W. (2018). Legal ownership is psychological: Evidence from young children (pp. 19-31). In J. Peck and S. Shu (Eds.), Psychological ownership and consumer behavior. New York: Springer. ​

  • Goulding, B. W. & Friedman, O. (2018). The development of territory-based inferences of ownership. Cognition, 177, 142-149.  ​

  • Lenton-Brym, A. P., Moscovitch, D. A., Vidovic, V., Nilson, E., & Friedman, O. (2018). Theory of mind ability in high socially anxious individuals. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 31, 487-499. ​

  • Nancekivell, S. E. & Friedman, O. (2018). Spoiled for choice: Identifying the building blocks of folk-economic beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e183. Commentary on Boyer & Petersen (same issue).​

  • Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2018). Using versus liking: Young children use ownership to predict actions, but not to infer preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 19-29. ​

  • Weatherhead, D., Friedman, O., & White, K. S. (2018). Accent, language, and race: 4-6-year-old children’s inferences differ by speaker cue. Child Development, 89, 1613-1624. ​

  • Weatherhead, D., White, K. S., & Friedman, O. (2018). Children’s accent-based inferences depend on geographic background. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 175, 108-116. 

  • Huh, M. & Friedman, O. (2017). Young children’s understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology, 53, 686-697. ​

  • Nancekivell, S. & Friedman O. (2017). "Because it's hers": When preschoolers use ownership in their explanations. Cognitive Science, 41, 827-843. ​

  • Nancekivell, S. & Friedman O. (2017). She bought the unicorn from the pet store: Six-to-seven-year-olds are strongly inclined to generate natural explanations. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1079-1087.​

  • Turri, J., Friedman, O., & Keefner, A. (2017). Knowledge central: A central role for knowledge attributions in social evaluations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 504-515. 

  • Van de Vondervoort, J. W. & Friedman, O. (2017). Young children protest and correct pretense that contradicts their general knowledge. Cognitive Development, 43, 182-189.

  • Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Meinz, P., & Friedman, O. (2017). Children's judgments about ownership rights and body rights: Evidence for a common basis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 1-11.​

  • Baer, C. & Friedman, O. (2016). Children's generic interpretation of pretense. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 99-111. 

  • McEwan, S., Pesowski, M.L., & Friedman, O. (2016). Identical but not interchangeable: Preschoolers view owned objects as non-fungible. Cognition, 146, 16-21.
  • Millar, C., Starmans, C., Fugelsang, J., & Friedman, O. (2016). It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 326-331.
  • Nancekivell, S.E., Millar, J.C., Summers, P.C., & Friedman, O. (2016). Ownership rights. In J. Sytsma & J.W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A companion to experimental philosophy (pp. 247-256). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. 
  • Pesowski, M. L., Denison, S., & Friedman, O. (2016). Young children infer preferences from a single action, but not if it is constrained. Cognition, 155, 168-175.
  • Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2016). Preschoolers use emotional reactions to infer relations: The case of ownership. Cognitive Development, 40, 60-67.
  • Starmans, C. & Friedman, O. (2016). If I am free you can't own me: Autonomy makes entities less ownable. Cognition, 148, 145-153.
  • Weatherhead, D., White, K. S., & Friedman, O. (2016). Where are you from? Preschoolers infer background from accent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 171-178.
  • Friedman, O. & Turri, J. (2015). Is probabilistic evidence a source of knowledge? Cognitive Science, 39, 1062-1080.
  • Levene, M., Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2015). Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 103-109.
  • Mathy, F., Friedman, O., Courenq, B., Laurent, L., & Millot, J.L. (2015). Rule-based category use in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 1-18.
  • Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2015). Preschoolers and toddlers use ownership to predict basic emotions. Emotion, 15, 104-108.
  • Ross, H., Friedman, O., & Field, A. (2015). Toddlers assert and acknowledge ownership rights. Social Development, 24, 341-356.
  • Van de Vondervoort, J.W. & Friedman, O. (2015). Children have difficulty using object location to recognize when natural objects are owned. Cognitive Development, 35, 50-64.
  • Van de Vondervoort, J.W. & Friedman, O. (2015). Parallels in preschoolers’ and adults’ judgments about ownership rights and bodily rights. Cognitive Science, 39, 184-198.
  • Malcolm, S.L., Defeyter, M.A., & Friedman, O. (2014). Children and adults use gender- and age-stereotypes in ownership judgments. Journal of Cognition and Development15, 123-135.
  • Millar, J.C., Turri, J., & Friedman, O. (2014). For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 133, 79-84.
  • Nancekivell, S.E. & Friedman, O. (2014). Mine, yours, no-one's: Children’s understanding of how ownership affects object use. Developmental Psychology50, 1845-1853.
  • Nancekivell, S.E. & Friedman, O. (2014). Preschoolers selectively infer history when explaining outcomes: Evidence from explanations of ownership, liking, and use. Child Development85, 1236-1247.
  • Neary, K.R. & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development85, 326-337.
  • Turri, J. & Friedman, O. (2014). Winners and losers in the folk epistemology of lotteries. In J. Beebe (Ed.), Advances in experimental epistemology (pp. 45-69). New York: Continuum.
  • Van de Vondervoort, J.W. & Friedman, O. (2014). Preschoolers can infer general rules governing fantastical events in fiction. Developmental Psychology50, 1594-1599.
  • Friedman, O. (2013). How do children represent pretend play? In M. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 186-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Friedman, O, Van de Vondervoort, J.W., Defeyter, M.A., & Neary, K.R. (2013). First possession, history, and young children’s ownership judgments. Child Development, 84, 1519-1525.
  • Nancekivell, S.E., Van de Vondervoort, J.W., & Friedman, O. (2013). Young children’s understanding of ownership. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 243-247.
  • Neary, K.R. & Friedman, O. (2013). The origin of children’s appreciation of ownership rights. In M.R. Banaji & S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social World: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 356-360). New York: Oxford University Press. 
  • Starmans, C. & Friedman, O. (2013). Taking 'know' for an answer: A reply to Nagel, San Juan, and Mar. Cognition, 129, 662-665.
  • Sutherland, S.L. & Friedman, O. (2013). Just pretending can be really learning: Children use pretend-play as a source for acquiring generic knowledge. Developmental Psychology49, 1660-1668.
  • Neary, K.R., Van de Vondervoort, J.W., & Friedman, O. (2012). Artifacts and natural kinds: Children's judgments about whether objects are owned. Developmental Psychology, 48, 149-158.
  • Palamar, M., Le, D.T., Friedman, O. (2012). Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility. Cognition, 124, 201-208.
  • Starmans, C. & Friedman, O. (2012). The folk conception of knowledge. Cognition124, 272-283.
  • Sutherland, S. & Friedman, O. (2012). Preschoolers acquire general knowledge by sharing in pretense. Child Development, 83, 1064-1071. 
  • Friedman, O., Neary, K.R., Defeyter, M.A., & Malcolm, S.L. (2011). Ownership and object history. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 79-89.
  • Friedman, O. & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1-8.
  • Petrashek, A.R. & Friedman, O. (2011). The signature of inhibition in theory of mind: Children’s predictions of behavior based on avoidance desire. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 199-203
  • Baker, S., Friedman, O., & Leslie, A.M. (2010). The opposites task: Using general rules to test cognitive flexibility in preschoolers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 240-254.
  • Friedman, O. (2010). Necessary for possession: How people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1161-1169.
  • Friedman, O., Neary, K.R., Burnstein, C.L., & Leslie, A.M. (2010). Is young children's recognition of pretense metarepresentational or merely behavioral? Evidence from 2- and 3-year-olds' understanding of pretend sounds and speech. Cognition, 115, 314-319.
  • Neary, K.R., Friedman, O., & Burnstein, C.L. (2009). Preschoolers infer ownership from “control of permission”. Developmental Psychology, 45, 873-876.
  • Friedman, O. & Neary, K.R. (2009). First possession beyond the law: Adults' and young children's intuitions about ownership. Tulane Law Review, 83, 679-690.
  • Friedman, O. & Petrashek, A.R. (2009). Children do not follow the rule ‘ignorance means getting it wrong’. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 114-121.
  • Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: An assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290-295.
  • Friedman, O., & Neary, K.R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829-849.
  • Friedman, O., & Leslie, A.M. (2007). The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not 'behaving-as-if'. Cognition, 105, 103-124.
  • Bosco, F.M., Friedman, O., & Leslie, A.M. (2006). Recognition of pretend and real actions in play by one- and two-year-olds: Early success and why they fail (PDF). Cognitive Development, 21, 3-10.
  • Griffin, R., Friedman, O., Ween, J., Winner, E., Happé, F. & Brownell, H. (2006). Theory of Mind and the Right Cerebral Hemisphere: Refining the scope of impairment (PDF). Laterality, 11, 195-225.
  • Friedman, O., & Leslie, A.M. (2005). A developmental shift in processes underlying successful belief-desire reasoning (PDF)Developmental Science, 8, 218-225.
  • Friedman, O., & Leslie, A.M. (2004). A developmental shift in processes underlying successful belief-desire reasoning (PDF). Cognitive Science, 28, 963-977.
  • Leslie, A.M., Friedman, O., & German, T. P. (2004). Core mechanisms in 'theory of mind' (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 528-533.
  • Friedman, O. & Leslie, A.M. (2004). Mechanisms of belief-desire reasoning: Inhibition and bias (PDF). Psychological Science, 15, 547-552.
  • Friedman, O., Griffin, R., Brownell, H. & Winner, E. (2003). Problems with the seeing = knowing rule (PDF). Developmental Science, 6, 505-513.
  • Brownell, H., & Friedman, O. (2001). Discourse ability in patients with unilateral left and right hemisphere brain damage. In R. S. Berndt (Ed.),  Handbook of Neuropsychology, 2nd edition, Vol. 3. (pp. 189-203). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Brownell, H., Griffin, R., Winner, E., Friedman, O., & Happe, F. (2000). Cerebral lateralization and theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.),  Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism and developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2nd edition (pp. 311-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
University of Waterloo

Profiles by type