Incorporating the Flood Resilience Challenge Game into the Engineering Curriculum

Evalyna Bogdan Profile Picture Daniel Henstra Profile Picture Nadine Ibrahim Profile Picture

People playing Flood Resilience Game Flood Resilience Gameboard

Grant Recipients

Daniel Henstra, Political Science

Evalyna Bogdan, Political Science

Nadine Ibrahim, Civil and Environmental Engineering

Heather Murdock (Research Associate)

Shaieree Cottar (Research Associate)

Sina Golchi (Research Associate)

Description

Flooding is one of Canada’s costliest and most frequent disasters, however, traditional engineering approaches do not adequately address flooding problems. Engineering students lack sufficient training for understanding complex socio-environmental problems and have limited opportunities to gain skills in working collaboratively to address such problems.

An experiential learning opportunity is proposed as a 3-hour Flood Resilience Challenge (FRC) role-playing game for students in a third-year engineering course (cross-listed, available to students from multiple disciplines) at the University of Waterloo (UW). To foster deep learning for students, the FRC game seeks to promote a better understanding of the complexity of flooding issues (i.e., governance, risk management) as well as enhance their interpersonal and communication skills. The LITE research project will investigate the effectiveness of the FRC game as an online teaching and learning tool in the context of a large classroom (100+ students), including multiple disciplines, and the University of Waterloo learning environment.

References

Bots, P., & Van Daalen, E. (2007). Functional design of games to support natural resource management policy development. Simulation & Gaming, 38(4), 512–532. https://doi.org/ 10.1177%2F1046878107300674

Fustik, V., Rogleva, N. K., & Petrova, N. (2019). Gamification for practical engineering education in project and risk management [Conference proceeding]. IEEE EUROCON 2019 18th International Conference on Smart Technologies, Novi Sad, Serbia, pp. 1–4, https://10.1109/EUROCON.2019.8861900

Flood, S., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Blackett, P., & Edwards, P. (2018). Adaptive and interactive climate futures: Systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making. Environmental Research Letters13(6), 063005.

Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (2012). Introduction: New directions in social science. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science: Applied phronesis (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

Gilbert, B. L., Banks, J., Houser, J. H. W., Rhodes, S. J., and Lees, N. D., (2014). Student development in an experiential learning program. Journal of College Student Development, 55(7), 707–713.

Hanson, L. L., & Kahane, D. (2018). Introduction: Advancing public deliberation on climate change and other wicked problems. In L. L. Hanson (Ed.), Public deliberation on climate change (pp. 3–32). Athabasca University Press.

Haque, C. E., Kolba, M., Morton, P., & Quinn, N. P. (2002). Public involvement in the Red River Basin management decisions and preparedness for the next flood. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 4(4), 87–104.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press.

Kamaruzaman, F. M., Hamid, R., Mutalib, A. A. (2017). A review on issues and challenges in incorporating complex engineering problems in engineering curriculum and proposed solutions [Conference proceeding]. 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, pp. 697-701. https://10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467167

Klijn, F., Knoop, J. M., Ligtvoet, W., & Mens, M. J. P. (2012). In search of robust flood risk management alternatives for the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 1469–1479. https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/12/1469/2012/

McCarthy, D. D., Crandall, D. D., Whitelaw, G. S., General, Z., & Tsuji, L. J. (2011). A critical systems approach to social learning: Building adaptive capacity in social, ecological, epistemological (SEE) systems. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol16/iss3/art18/

McGillivray, G. (2016, January 18). Flood governance in Canada: Who’s minding the store? [Online article]. Canadian Underwriter. http://www.insblogs.com/business-risks/flood-governance-canadawhos-minding-store/6285

Mndzebele, S., & Mckenna, S. (2013). Applying a student curriculum discourse in higher education teaching and learning. Africa Education Review, 10(1), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.786210

Moser, S. (2012). Getting real about it: Navigating the psychological and social demands of a world in distress. In D. R. Gallagher, R. N. L. Andrews & N. L. Christensen (Eds.), Sage handbook on environmental leadership (pp. 432–440). Sage.

Powers, R. (2020, November). Unit 4 Week 11: Proposing Change. Traditional Organizational Change Theory. Athabasca University Survey of Current Educational Technology Applications Moodle: https://cde.lms.athabascau.ca/mod/book/view.php ?id=72098&chapterid=27098

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

Rodela, R., Cundill, G., & Wals, A. E. (2012). An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management. Ecological Economics, 77, 16–26. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.032

Salvini, G., Van Paassen, A., Ligtenberg, A., Carrero, G. C., & Bregt, A. K. (2016). A role-playing game as a tool to facilitate social learning and collective action towards Climate Smart Agriculture: Lessons learned from Apuí, Brazil. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.016

Shrubsole, D. (2013). A history of flood management strategies in Canada revisited. In E. C. H. Keskitalo (Ed.), Climate change and flood risk management: Adaptation and extreme events at the local level (pp. 95–120). Edward Elgar.

Sörensen, J., Persson, A., Sternudd, C., Aspegren, H., Nilsson, J., Nordström, J., . . . Mobini, S. (2016). Re-thinking urban flood managementtime for a regime shift. Water, 8(8), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8080332

Surry, D. & Farquhar, J. (1997). Diffusion theory and instructional technology. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 2(1). http://ascilite.org/archived-journals/e-jist/docs/vol2no1/article2.htm

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2009). UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/7817

University of Waterloo. (2008). Academic Program Reviews: Undergraduate Degree Level Expectations. https://uwaterloo.ca/academic-program-reviews/degree-level-expectations/undergraduate-degree-level-expectations

University of Waterloo. (2011). The Task Force on Innovative Teaching Practices to Promote Deep Learning at the University of Waterloo: Final Report. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/sites/ca.centre-for-teaching-excellence/files/uploads/files/Task%20Force%20Report%20on%20Deep%20Learning_0.pdf