Guidelines to Policy 71
The following information is intended to help students understand the process that normally occurs when an allegation has been made under Policy 71 – Student Discipline. This information does not override or supersede Policy 71. There will be cases that, by their nature, require treatment that differs from the process described below.
As described in Policy 71, you are entitled to:
- a presumption of innocence unless the contrary is established;
- be made aware of the case against them;
- have matters addressed fairly and expeditiously; and
- decisions are based on the balance of probabilities.
The following steps normally occur when resolving a student discipline matter:
1. Potential Informal Resolution Proposal
A Policy 71 matter may be settled informally either with the instructor or the Director of Academic Integrity.
2. Formal Investigation
When presented with evidence of a possible misconduct, the Director of Academic Integrity will either propose an informal resolution or issue an allegation letter to you that:
- outlines the alleged offence and, if applicable, the specific course involved,
- briefly summarizes the evidence for the allegation,
- provides you with five working days to respond to the allegation through a response letter.
After receipt of your written response or after the time for a response has passed, the Director of Academic Integrity shall conduct a thorough investigation of the allegation.
The details of an investigation are kept confidential. Only the people directly involved in any given investigation are aware of some or all of the details.
3. Receiving a Discipline Decision
It is difficult to predict how long it will take before a discipline letter is issued, but Policy 71 allows up to 50 days.
The Director of Academic Integrity will decide based on the evidence acquired during a formal investigation and issue a discipline letter, which outlines the final decision and assigned penalties, if applicable.
Decisions regarding guilt are made on a balance of probabilities. Penalties are based on Policy 71’s Guidelines for Assessment of Penalties.
These guidelines describe typical penalties for various offences. Compelling mitigating and aggravating factors may alter the penalty assigned. Some investigations will result in the case being dismissed based on insufficient or inconclusive evidence to support the allegation.
4. Option to Appeal a Discipline Decision
A decision may be appealed under Policy 72 – Student Appeals only when you are able to establish that the outcome of the case might have been substantially affected by one of more of the following grounds:
- a fundamental procedural error seriously prejudicial to you,
- clear evidence of bias in a decision,
- significant new information relevant to the case that was not available through diligence prior to the decision has been discovered,
- the evidence provided has been given inadequate weight,
- the severity of the penalty imposed exceeds the nature of the offence for reasons you identify.
Dissatisfaction with University policy, remorse or ignorance is not a sufficient ground for appeal.